I found Steve Sipple's article on "Game manager or game changer?" to be very intriguing.
http://www.huskerextra.com/articles/2010/08/24/football/doc4c7337afcf40f860118970.txt
It really throws into question which kind of QB do we need this year, a game manager (Zac Lee) or a game changer (Cody Green or Taylor Martinez). My pick is a game manager. My reason for that is, i don't really rely on a fresh playermaker to control my offense unless I am in a bind or my game manager isn't managing things very well on the offensive side of the ball. I don't see a reason this year to call upon a young game changer if a veteran game manager can win the game.
All thing being equal you may have a good point. I still think "game management" is grossly over-rated as there's zillions of guys who can't run but can hand the ball off and throw safe incomplete passes for yet another 3 & out. Bfd. There's a heavy, heavy dose of "coach speak" going on here I suspect.
However, there's a big difference regarding NU's near future. Lee is done after this year while Green will have two more years and Tmart three more years.
I bet Bo likes the idea of next year entering the Big10 with a qb who's experienced "and" a playmaker in contrast to very little experience at qb returning and their play making abilities not known. Now if Lee was
clearly the best available that would be a different deal. But by all indications so far he's not.
Also, why would you put your potential playmakers on the bench? Lee may indeed be "serviceable" as many claim but that's his ceiling. From what I've seen and read, Green & especially TMart's potential ceilings are much, much higher.
Nope....I don't buy it. It's Green or TMart starting by BigXII play.