BigRedBuster
Active member
Who is trying to outlaw doing that?Kinda like how you can’t refer to a man as a man or women as a women or a mother as a mother. Getting equally crazy on both sides.
Who is trying to outlaw doing that?Kinda like how you can’t refer to a man as a man or women as a women or a mother as a mother. Getting equally crazy on both sides.
Your defense of government banning of certain books is that some people want you to call them by a different pronoun? Really?Kinda like how you can’t refer to a man as a man or women as a women or a mother as a mother. Getting equally crazy on both sides.
Your comprehension skills are lacking it seems.Your defense of government banning of certain books is that some people want you to call them by a different pronoun? Really?
Educate me. Where's the pronoun banning law?Your comprehension skills are lacking it seems.
Well you can start by looking at the language Pelosi has deemed inappropriate. Then you can take a gander at at all the Universities regulating that language.Educate me. Where's the pronoun banning law?
Saying something is inappropriate is a far cry from outlawing it.Well you can start by looking at the language Pelosi has deemed inappropriate. Then you can take a gander at at all the Universities regulating that language.
Lastly I never defended government banning books as your smear of me said.
So no, you can't actually find a pronoun banning law. Maybe just admit it was terribly inaccurate analogy.Well you can start by looking at the language Pelosi has deemed inappropriate. Then you can take a gander at at all the Universities regulating that language.
"Getting equally crazy on both sides" is an attempt to minimize/distract from government laws that ban books.Lastly I never defended government banning books as your smear of me said.
I’m glad you admit you falsely accused me of doing something I didn’t do. :thumbsSo no, you can't actually find a pronoun banning law. Maybe just admit it was terribly inaccurate analogy.
"Getting equally crazy on both sides" is an attempt to minimize/distract from government laws that ban books.
If you don't want to be seen as defending government book bans, then maybe don't jump in and attempt to redirect to something else. :dunno
I'll be far more concerned about actual book bans by the government while you try to brush it aside.I’m glad you admit you falsely accused me of doing something I didn’t do. :thumbs
Banning language on college campuses while not “A Law” it’s also not very bright. I’ll stand by my analogy.
Well since I didn’t brush anything aside, actually called both sides crazy, I’ll assume your comprehension still sucks.I'll be far more concerned about actual book bans by the government while you try to brush it aside.
We all know how whataboutism and "both sides" works.Well since I didn’t brush anything aside, actually called both sides crazy, I’ll assume your comprehension still sucks.
Yes, it's a ban of books that contain certain language.BYW…what book was being banned? The post I saw talked about language.
Other words/phrases that can't be used in education:
Fair wage
Disciplining students
Keeping crazy parents away