DevoHusker
New member
3 strike felon....vs first time offender. Don't personally agree, but those are the sentencing laws in place.
There is always more to the headline than the s#!t Ben Crump throws out on twitter3 strike felon....vs first time offender. Don't personally agree, but those are the sentencing laws in place.
Do you agree with the disparity in sentencing?There is always more to the headline than the s#!t Ben Crump throws out on twitter
If it was apples to apples comparison then no.Do you agree with the disparity in sentencing?
Life in prison for possession of marijuana compared to killing a man. Even if the marijuana guy had a prior record? Hmmmm.....If it was apples to apples comparison then no.
i wonder what his other 2 offenses were? if he shot a man just to watch him die i could see the logic in this. if he was caught with marijuana 2 times previously i have a problem with thisLife in prison for possession of marijuana compared to killing a man. Even if the marijuana guy had a prior record? Hmmmm.....
Two burglaries and unlawful possession of a firearm; so, by state law and based on his crimes, he was a habitual offender and eligible for a life sentence on the marijuana possession.i wonder what his other 2 offenses were? if he shot a man just to watch him die i could see the logic in this. if he was caught with marijuana 2 times previously i have a problem with this
I don't know about anybody else, but I think it's disappointing that when I see tweets like this... I feel obligated to look into the cases to see if there's something that's not being explicitly said. It shouldn't be like that.There is always more to the headline than the s#!t Ben Crump throws out on twitter
I feel like this should all be pretty simple in regards to the criminal justice system as a whole. If what you do does not hurt anyone else or their property then you arent going to jail period. If you want to issue a fine for some of the devils lettuce so be it but under no circumstance should someone be put in prison for ingesting something into their own body.Two burglaries and unlawful possession of a firearm; so, by state law and based on his crimes, he was a habitual offender and eligible for a life sentence on the marijuana possession.
Personally, and I think most would agree, it's a ridiculous situation. Some dissenting judges in Mississippi argued that exceptions can and should be made in these kind of situations but, alas, he'll serve a life sentence.
I don't know about anybody else, but I think it's disappointing that when I see tweets like this... I feel obligated to look into the cases to see if there's something that's not being explicitly said. It shouldn't be like that.
It seems like this is the wrong use of mandatory lifetime sentencing. Crump would have been better off showing a white prisoner who had three felonies with the last one being a drug offense who didn’t get a life sentence to make his point.Two burglaries and unlawful possession of a firearm; so, by state law and based on his crimes, he was a habitual offender and eligible for a life sentence on the marijuana possession.
Personally, and I think most would agree, it's a ridiculous situation. Some dissenting judges in Mississippi argued that exceptions can and should be made in these kind of situations but, alas, he'll serve a life sentence.
I don't know about anybody else, but I think it's disappointing that when I see tweets like this... I feel obligated to look into the cases to see if there's something that's not being explicitly said. It shouldn't be like that.
With marijuana, I agree. I've seen enough research and evidence to convince me that it should be legalized or, at the very least, not result in incarceration. Situations like the one involving Mr. Russell are more indicative of poorly written laws and application of said laws than anything else. (They're also the kinds of situations that breed accusations of systemic racism. I would imagine laws like that disproportionately impact minority groups but I've never looked into it.)I feel like this should all be pretty simple in regards to the criminal justice system as a whole. If what you do does not hurt anyone else or their property then you arent going to jail period. If you want to issue a fine for some of the devils lettuce so be it but under no circumstance should someone be put in prison for ingesting something into their own body.
It's a pathetic sentence when if he was simply in another state, it would be legal. But, he gets a life sentence. Meanwhile, a guy kills another man and gets less sentence.It seems like this is the wrong use of mandatory lifetime sentencing. Crump would have been better off showing a white prisoner who had three felonies with the last one being a drug offense who didn’t get a life sentence to make his point.
Killing a 5 yr old gets less time than Chauvin. Alert Mr. Crump please.It's a pathetic sentence when if he was simply in another state, it would be legal. But, he gets a life sentence. Meanwhile, a guy kills another man and gets less sentence.