RB Arnold Barnes [Tulane - Signed LOI]

To which school will Barnes commit?

  • Total voters
    0
Curious why the OP has his weight as 190. All three recruiting sites I checked showed from 220-225. I know there's some fudging of numbers there a lot of the time but he looks thicker than 190.

He'd be the biggest RB on the roster only behind Yant. Who just isn't that great. We could use a future thumper.

 
Danny Bateman said:
Curious why the OP has his weight as 190. All three recruiting sites I checked showed from 220-225. I know there's some fudging of numbers there a lot of the time but he looks thicker than 190.

He'd be the biggest RB on the roster only behind Yant. Who just isn't that great. We could use a future thumper.
Click to expand...


It's more of an art than a science to try to figure out what the real numbers are.  I usually start with what 247 has but will tweak it depending on what their HUDL page says.  His HUDL page still says 5-11, 190.  But the recruiting sites all say somewhere around 5-9, 220.

220 seems more likely in this case so I updated it.

Thanks.

 
I’m sure he’ll be fine but that’s a pretty tough situation for him. Wonder if Tulane would take him back- they’ve done a great job developing skill players. Spears is a stud.

 
Born N Bled Red said:
Sucks, probably damaged the relationship with Stanley Morgan as a result too.... why do we keep alienating former players who should be our best promoters? 
Click to expand...
Did we alienate smj?  If this kid isn't a fit, he's not a fit.  No disrespect. 

I don't think recruiting only players with relationships with former huskers, or only kids that went to schools of former huskers is a super sound strategy. 

Lean on that, use it as you need it.  Always keep the door open for your former players, but never make them a crutch.

 
Cobra Kai said:
Did we alienate smj?  If this kid isn't a fit, he's not a fit.  No disrespect. 

I don't think recruiting only players with relationships with former huskers, or only kids that went to schools of former huskers is a super sound strategy. 

Lean on that, use it as you need it.  Always keep the door open for your former players, but never make them a crutch.
Click to expand...


Never said that should be a strategy, but this kid is SJM's cousin, as posted above, he was stoked his cousin was going to be a 'Sker. Dropping this kid by "choosing not to communicate" is bound to leave a sour taste in SJM's mouth. Just saying, we've seen it with Clester, probably going to see it with Benning, Raiola, etc. These guys should be our ambassadors, not ones counseling their kids and others to steer clear. 

 
Born N Bled Red said:
Never said that should be a strategy, but this kid is SJM's cousin, as posted above, he was stoked his cousin was going to be a 'Sker. Dropping this kid by "choosing not to communicate" is bound to leave a sour taste in SJM's mouth. Just saying, we've seen it with Clester, probably going to see it with Benning, Raiola, etc. These guys should be our ambassadors, not ones counseling their kids and others to steer clear. 
Click to expand...
I'm not smj...but I played in college.  My wife was a college athlete as well.  If my kids decide to play at the next level I'll be damned if I'm going to make it about me.

It's what's best for the kid and the program.  Not mom's and dads, aunts or uncles.

I get what you're saying.  I'm guessing smj is just fine.  If not, I'm sure they'll all be fine down the road.  

No school is obligated to recruit previous player's family...and they all know that.  For them to get butt hurt about it is kinda silly.  

It's a foot in the door that should be used as needed,  yes.  But it better not be the be all end all strategy. 

 
Back
Top