RB Austin Rose [Nebraska Preferred Walk-On]

Status
Not open for further replies.
With our current RB depth, including Newby and Taylor... Mr. Rose in 2014 and Mr. Strong for 2015 and call it good?

 
He played some D for Northstar last year- very little at LB

I doubt he plays much on D this year- I think they are expecting him to carry even more of the load than last year

 
His 4.1 agility is very good as well. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe 3.9 is like the best of the best when talking about lateral movement.

 
Atbone95 said:
blessed2bahusker said:
His 4.1 agility is very good as well. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe 3.9 is like the best of the best when talking about lateral movement.
Click to expand...
I know two kids at my school who can get under 4... Granted, they're extremely fast, but I would assume college athletes could do better. Not sure on the 3.9 mark.
Click to expand...

Not sure your times are accurrate

MOST DI top kids are in the 4.4- 4.6 area:

http://247sports.com/Article/Under-Armour-Combine-Top-20--10074

 
We're talking a pro agility drill?

Edit: Realized my mistake. I saw agility and just instantly assumed it was a pro-agility drill. That is what we're talking about, right..

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Someone help me out with this please. So it shows he doesn't have any offers yet on rivals but shows a lengthy list of school with interest level. Are those schools that he had mentioned he's interested in, during an interview or something? or does rivals just put a list of schools until he starts getting offers and different interest levels?

 
I have wondered the same thing for a long time. Someone posted at one time that the schools listed without offers are directly from the kid or his family. Those schools are suppose to be the schools that have shown some sort of interest such as a letter or phone call. I imagine that the the site, like rivals for instance, has some form of feedback where the kid will update them on what schools are showing interest or offering, whether it be an interview or e-mail or even text message. The way it is all set up obviously lends itself to some misinformation being put out there. I can remember a handful of times where a kid has offers listed which turn out to be untrue. I imagine the schools listed as showing interest are untrue sometimes as well.

 
jmfb said:
Atbone95 said:
blessed2bahusker said:
His 4.1 agility is very good as well. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe 3.9 is like the best of the best when talking about lateral movement.
Click to expand...
I know two kids at my school who can get under 4... Granted, they're extremely fast, but I would assume college athletes could do better. Not sure on the 3.9 mark.
Click to expand...

Not sure your times are accurrate

MOST DI top kids are in the 4.4- 4.6 area:

http://247sports.com/Article/Under-Armour-Combine-Top-20--10074
Click to expand...
So what we can deduce is that Austin's 4.1 is special!
 
RedRedJarvisRedwhine said:
jmfb said:
Atbone95 said:
blessed2bahusker said:
His 4.1 agility is very good as well. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe 3.9 is like the best of the best when talking about lateral movement.
Click to expand...
I know two kids at my school who can get under 4... Granted, they're extremely fast, but I would assume college athletes could do better. Not sure on the 3.9 mark.
Click to expand...

Not sure your times are accurrate

MOST DI top kids are in the 4.4- 4.6 area:

http://247sports.com...e-Top-20--10074
Click to expand...
So what we can deduce is that Austin's 4.1 is special!
Click to expand...
I guess- with the exception of atbone95 has a bunch of kids in his HS that run a 3.9 "pro agility" that somehow is different while being the same but uses the same exact term "pro agility" LOL

 
jmfb said:
RedRedJarvisRedwhine said:
jmfb said:
Atbone95 said:
blessed2bahusker said:
His 4.1 agility is very good as well. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe 3.9 is like the best of the best when talking about lateral movement.
Click to expand...
I know two kids at my school who can get under 4... Granted, they're extremely fast, but I would assume college athletes could do better. Not sure on the 3.9 mark.
Click to expand...
Not sure your times are accurrate

MOST DI top kids are in the 4.4- 4.6 area:

http://247sports.com...e-Top-20--10074
Click to expand...
So what we can deduce is that Austin's 4.1 is special!
Click to expand...
I guess- with the exception of atbone95 has a bunch of kids in his HS that run a 3.9 "pro agility" that somehow is different while being the same but uses the same exact term "pro agility" LOL
Click to expand...
I see the word pro-agility used twice in that article. One is for a DE who runs a 4.5. Great for a DL. One is for a RB who ran a 4.3 on a damp field that slowed him down. Already, we have someone who (in sloppy conditions) beats out your "most D1 top kids". Unless the drills I've seen set up are somehow shorter, 4.4-4.6 is not the best of the best. Pretty sure T-Mart runs right below a 3.9, which is the school record. I'm not inventing information here.

Edit: On the topic of the recruit, yes, 4.1 is a great pro agility time. Not the best, but I'm sure it can be improved upon when coming into a college program.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top