Refs

[knapplc]

I sure hope I can iritate you some more in the future,

Calm down. If you cannot calm yourself, you will be calmed.

I am clam just replying in kind to his post

Whether you're clam or oyster, your response was not warranted.

And his telling another what they can post and how to post it is OK. No Problem Sorry to disturb this board.

He didn't make it personal. Huge difference there.

Apology accepted, Captain Needa.

 

[huskernumerouno]

I sure hope I can iritate you some more in the future,

Calm down. If you cannot calm yourself, you will be calmed.

I am clam just replying in kind to his post

Whether you're clam or oyster, your response was not warranted.

And his telling another what they can post and how to post it is OK. No Problem Sorry to disturb this board.

He didn't make it personal. Huge difference there.

Apology accepted, Captain Needa.

Have a great day

GBR GBR GBR after all we are all wanting the same thing.

A WIN AGAINST THE buffs :bonesflag: :throwdabones1: :bonesflag: It is late over here and I am going to bed.

NI NI

 

[knapplc]

All righty, then. Stay safe, and GBR.

 

[Danimal]

Thing with the "Bo revenge" theory is that doesn't it make WAY more sense call a square game and flag Bo if he gets out of hand than call a crap game and ignore Bo? First, it's your damn job to call a square game, it just is. Second, if you don't like the outbursts address the damn outbursts with flags(it will work), don't be passive-aggressive by increasing the stimuli that cause the outbursts.

I don't know if the "Bo revenge" theory holds much water. I think it is mainly political and certain refs not being above homerism. There is probably a little to it, if there is a lot to it the refs would have to be not only dishonest but stupid and infantile.