Roe v Wade overturned????? Draft says so

Do you agree wt the draft majority opinion

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 20.0%

  • No

    Votes: 28 80.0%

  • Not sure

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    35
Good Lord man.  A five minute read, or in his case a 30 minute read, on what IVF is used for would have provided him with enough information to at least not look utterly confused.  Boebert, Madge, or Putinville....who is the dumbest in Congress?


 
teachercd said:
This is why, once again, I am right and my ideas are the ones that should be used

1.  Men have no say in abortion UNLESS it is for it.

2.  Clinics all over each state

3.  Abortions are free, period

4.  No ID needed, no age requirement or parents getting involved, no protesting at clinics within 200 yards.  

There, I solved another problem. 
Click to expand...


But......you're the same guy who always lies to every woman he meets!

 
Just one example of the Republicans scrambling to cover their tracks.  When you vote for laws stating life begins at conception this is what happens.  They didn't think it through but now they're scrambling for two reasons.

1) people will hold them accountable at election time 

2) this will affect people they know who need IVF if they want to have kids.  


 
https://www.businessinsider.in/politics/world/news/125-house-republicans-including-speaker-mike-johnson-back-a-life-at-conception-bill-without-any-ivf-exception/articleshow/107953568.cms

"Most House Republicans have cosponsored a bill declaring that life begins from the moment of conception, a position under increased scrutiny after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are "unborn children."

"This Congress, 125 House Republicans — including Speaker Mike Johnson — have cosponsored the "Life at Conception Act," which states that the term "human being" includes "all stages of life, including the moment of fertilization, cloning, or other moment at which an individual member of the human species comes into being."

"The bill does not include any exception for in vitro fertilization (IVF), a reproductive treatment that allows mothers to fertilize several eggs outside the womb in order to increase the chances of a viable pregnancy"

 
Scarlet said:
https://www.businessinsider.in/politics/world/news/125-house-republicans-including-speaker-mike-johnson-back-a-life-at-conception-bill-without-any-ivf-exception/articleshow/107953568.cms

"Most House Republicans have cosponsored a bill declaring that life begins from the moment of conception, a position under increased scrutiny after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are "unborn children."

"This Congress, 125 House Republicans — including Speaker Mike Johnson — have cosponsored the "Life at Conception Act," which states that the term "human being" includes "all stages of life, including the moment of fertilization, cloning, or other moment at which an individual member of the human species comes into being."

"The bill does not include any exception for in vitro fertilization (IVF), a reproductive treatment that allows mothers to fertilize several eggs outside the womb in order to increase the chances of a viable pregnancy"
Click to expand...
I was specifically told this was a state's rights issue, why would Congress be sponsoring this kind of legislation?

 
I’m pretty close to this right now on the issue. There is no way in hell the government can figure out what’s best in each individual situation.  I want to keep reducing the number of abortions like has happened since the 70s. But, we also need to recognize that there needs to be major programs helping families, single moms and kids born in these situations so they have a chance at a good life. AND….sex education and birth control easily available for young people. 
 


 
BigRedBuster said:
I’m pretty close to this right now on the issue. There is no way in hell the government can figure out what’s best in each individual situation.  I want to keep reducing the number of abortions like has happened since the 70s. But, we also need to recognize that there needs to be major programs helping families, single moms and kids born in these situations so they have a chance at a good life. AND….sex education and birth control easily available for young people. 
 
Click to expand...
Safe, legal and rare

 
These people are proposing that women who have abortions and doctors who perform those abortions be given the death penalty in the name of saving lives.  Even those who report to the E.R. in the midst of a miscarriage could be prosecuted for murder because, according to these people, most who do so are lying about it. 

The process of IVF will also be grounds for prosecution for murder because that egg that can frozen at -300f for 30 year is a human will full rights. 

They also propose that there be no exceptions for rape or incest but you know if their 14 year old daughter was raped and impregnated they're headed to the nearest state that allows for abortions.  Remember when we were all told sliding down this slippery slope was hyperbole?  


 
Pro-lifers should be beaten, period.

If you don't want to get an abortion don't get one.

As far as "eye for an eye" yes, 100%, which is why we NEED the death penalty.  But clearly abortion is not murder.  Unless you are a crazy person. 

 
Scarlet said:
These people are proposing that women who have abortions and doctors who perform those abortions be given the death penalty in the name of saving lives.  Even those who report to the E.R. in the midst of a miscarriage could be prosecuted for murder because, according to these people, most who do so are lying about it. 

The process of IVF will also be grounds for prosecution for murder because that egg that can frozen at -300f for 30 year is a human will full rights. 

They also propose that there be no exceptions for rape or incest but you know if their 14 year old daughter was raped and impregnated they're headed to the nearest state that allows for abortions.  Remember when we were all told sliding down this slippery slope was hyperbole?  
Click to expand...
So humans can survive in -300 degress F for 30 years now? I guess I bought the wrong type of long johns.

 
teachercd said:
Pro-lifers should be beaten, period.

If you don't want to get an abortion don't get one.

As far as "eye for an eye" yes, 100%, which is why we NEED the death penalty.  But clearly abortion is not murder.  Unless you are a crazy person. 
Click to expand...
:facepalm:

Teach, no need to add stupidity on top of stupidity - speaking of the bold above.

I'm pro-life and I surely don't agree with that non-sense in the video.     

 
Back
Top