Roe v Wade overturned????? Draft says so

Do you agree wt the draft majority opinion

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 20.0%

  • No

    Votes: 28 80.0%

  • Not sure

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    35
knapplc said:
I'm not sure what this means.
Click to expand...
I bet you do...but I'll play along.

Somewhere around 7% of abortions are due to rape, incest, or health of the mother.  So over 90% are for the myriad of other reasons chosen to kill the unborn child, which can be referred to as just because...rather than listing the myriad of other reasons.

RedDenver said:
It means people want to categorize the reasons other people are getting abortions based on their own pre-conceived notions of those reasons.
Click to expand...
Or, it means people don't  :dunno

 
DevoHusker said:
I bet you do...but I'll play along.

Somewhere around 7% of abortions are due to rape, incest, or health of the mother.  So over 90% are for the myriad of other reasons chosen to kill the unborn child, which can be referred to as just because...rather than listing the myriad of other reasons.

Or, it means people don't  :dunno
Click to expand...
"just because" is definitely not the same as "myriad of other reasons". It's like saying people go to the emergency room 12% of the time for broken bones and car accidents and then the rest "fall into the just because category". You're trying to imply that those myriad of other reasons are not important by calling calling the reasoning "just because". And you're doing that without actually considering what those reasons are or might be - or what I called "based on [your] own pre-conceived notions of those reasons".

 
RedDenver said:
"just because" is definitely not the same as "myriad of other reasons". It's like saying people go to the emergency room 12% of the time for broken bones and car accidents and then the rest "fall into the just because category". You're trying to imply that those myriad of other reasons are not important by calling calling the reasoning "just because". And you're doing that without actually considering what those reasons are or might be - or what I called "based on [your] own pre-conceived notions of those reasons".
Click to expand...
You're imprinting your views, not mine. You have chosen to put a label on me, without knowing  me...much the same as you are accusing me of doing. You're simply bickering because you don't find my point, which is true, to be in line with your personal view.

 
DevoHusker said:
You're imprinting your views, not mine. You have chosen to put a label on me, without knowing  me...much the same as you are accusing me of doing. You're simply bickering because you don't find my point, which is true, to be in line with your personal view.
Click to expand...
I'm calling out your attempt to be dismissive of any other reasons based on the language you used in your post. It has nothing to do with knowing you as I can read what you've written.

And I especially like where you assert that your point is true - again without anything to back it up but your own personal view while simultaneously accusing me of bickering based on my personal view - that's rich.

 
Back
Top