BigRedBuster
Active member
I think this is getting to the point where Russia needs it's own thread. I have been putting a lot of Russia stuff in other threads, but this is getting serious and deserves it's own topic.
Opensecrets.org
McClatchyDC.com
Their actions are far greater than trying to hack into our election computers.
And....our President is complicit with it.
Opensecrets.org
In North Carolina, the NRA spent $6.2 million on the incumbent Republican Sen. Richard Burr, the most it has ever invested in a down-ballot race. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)
The National Rifle Association took a historic gamble in 2016, and it paid off in a huge way.
The gun rights group placed multimillion-dollar bets on Donald Trump and six Republican Senate candidates locked in highly competitive races. It poured $50.2 million, or 96 percent of its total outside spending, into these races, and lost only one — an open seat in Nevada, vacated by the Democratic Minority Leader, Harry Reid. That race cost the NRA roughly $2.5 million.
McClatchyDC.com
WASHINGTON
The NRA told the Federal Election Commission it spent $55 million during the 2016 election cycle. But according to two insiders at the powerful gun lobby, the total was far greater.
The group — which broke with longstanding practice Thursday by coming out in favor of a measure to clamp down on a device that can make rifles more deadly — has long been a major campaign contributor, particularly, in recent years, to Republicans. In 2016, the group’s reports filed with the Federal Election Commission showed it shelled out a record-setting $55 million combined on independent political spending and direct contributions to candidates in federal races.
But two NRA sources told McClatchy that the group spent even more — close to $70 million, and perhaps much more. One source, a prominent NRA committee member, told McClatchy in several interviews that the gun group’s chieftain Wayne LaPierre informed him of the higher number. And the second, a leading conservative with strong ties to the NRA, said he was told that the number was actually higher. Both sources requested anonymity because they were not authorized to disclose the information, which was not required to be public.
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/article177312006.html#storylink=cpy
Their actions are far greater than trying to hack into our election computers.
And....our President is complicit with it.