S Su'a Cravens [USC Commit]

huskersfan7 said:
'SkersRule said:
huskersfan7 said:
it would be awesome if he picked us at the army all American game. but:

1. doubt he'll wait that long

2. probably end up at USC
Click to expand...
That's the spirit!
Click to expand...
everybody else doesn't think we can get him so i thought i would follow along. but seriously, for some odd reason i think we'll land him and jojo
Click to expand...
Just to be clear I actually agree with the notion that we probably won't sign Cravens. But I figure as long as he has us in his top 5, along with USC, Ohio State, Michigan, or Oklahoma we have just as good of a shot as they do. Normally I'd say that we have an above average shot since we've signed his friend and teammate Corey Whitaker, but we lost Andrus Peat to Stanford when we had his older brother Todd here. So I'll keep hope alive that we'll land Su'a. And if we do land this stud.... :w00t

 
We all want Su'a, but our history with prospects of his caliber haven't been plesant. I can probably speak for a majority of Husker fans in that, outside of his commitment, the other thing we want is from him to give us a fair and unbiased shot as he can. That's all we can ask for.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The thing I see that could help us out with Su'a and USC is that there are 2 or 3 other safeties that are interested in USC also...Max Redfield, Taahan(sp) Goodman and Priest Willis. All 3 are exceptional players and hopefully USC can only take 1 or 2 of them. I know that they would probably take all 4 and make room, but would the kids be up for it.

 
Stumpy1 said:
The thing I see that could help us out with Su'a and USC is that there are 2 or 3 other safeties that are interested in USC also...Max Redfield, Taahan(sp) Goodman and Priest Willis. All 3 are exceptional players and hopefully USC can only take 1 or 2 of them. I know that they would probably take all 4 and make room, but would the kids be up for it.
Click to expand...
USC has 10 less schollies this year.

 
RedDenver said:
Stumpy1 said:
The thing I see that could help us out with Su'a and USC is that there are 2 or 3 other safeties that are interested in USC also...Max Redfield, Taahan(sp) Goodman and Priest Willis. All 3 are exceptional players and hopefully USC can only take 1 or 2 of them. I know that they would probably take all 4 and make room, but would the kids be up for it.
Click to expand...
USC has 10 less schollies this year.
Click to expand...
This is true, but even if they have 1,2,or 3 safties committed already you make room for someone like Cravens. Unfortunately one of the other safties may get told to look elsewhere, greyshirt, or that there commit is well received and will be accepted only if they don't get other prospects they want more.

 
C N Red said:
RedDenver said:
Stumpy1 said:
The thing I see that could help us out with Su'a and USC is that there are 2 or 3 other safeties that are interested in USC also...Max Redfield, Taahan(sp) Goodman and Priest Willis. All 3 are exceptional players and hopefully USC can only take 1 or 2 of them. I know that they would probably take all 4 and make room, but would the kids be up for it.
Click to expand...
USC has 10 less schollies this year.
Click to expand...
This is true, but even if they have 1,2,or 3 safties committed already you make room for someone like Cravens. Unfortunately one of the other safties may get told to look elsewhere, greyshirt, or that there commit is well received and will be accepted only if they don't get other prospects they want more.
Click to expand...
Or they can just force someone already there out.

 
C N Red said:
RedDenver said:
Stumpy1 said:
The thing I see that could help us out with Su'a and USC is that there are 2 or 3 other safeties that are interested in USC also...Max Redfield, Taahan(sp) Goodman and Priest Willis. All 3 are exceptional players and hopefully USC can only take 1 or 2 of them. I know that they would probably take all 4 and make room, but would the kids be up for it.
Click to expand...
USC has 10 less schollies this year.
Click to expand...
This is true, but even if they have 1,2,or 3 safties committed already you make room for someone like Cravens. Unfortunately one of the other safties may get told to look elsewhere, greyshirt, or that there commit is well received and will be accepted only if they don't get other prospects they want more.
Click to expand...
Notice that his initial offer to SC was for HB. So I could see them taking the aforementioned prospects above and using Su'a on offense and he could be a heck of a back. Either way if he is an SC lean, they will have him.

 
Treand3 said:
Notice that his initial offer to SC was for HB. So I could see them taking the aforementioned prospects above and using Su'a on offense and he could be a heck of a back. Either way if he is an SC lean, they will have him.
Click to expand...
yeah but what if they get justin davis and/or ty issac? i know i'm kidna grasping at straws here.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
huskersfan7 said:
Treand3 said:
Notice that his initial offer to SC was for HB. So I could see them taking the aforementioned prospects above and using Su'a on offense and he could be a heck of a back. Either way if he is an SC lean, they will have him.
Click to expand...
yeah but what if they get justin davis and/or ty issac?
Click to expand...
I guess they'll just have them. Either way Cravens, will have a spot for USC and they've been known to switch players over to Offense.

 
Back
Top