Agreed. He won't be 0-12 his first two seasons, but if he was, I'd still have plenty of confidence he'll eventually get us where we want to be. This could be our next Osborne, but as mentioned before, Frost isn't walking into a top 10 program like Osborne did. I think he can get us back to 9-4 within 3 seasons, if not sooner, but being in the playoff convo might end up being a decade out.
** Scott Frost megathread all things SF***
- Thread starter brophog
- Start date
- Status
Agreed. He won't be 0-12 his first two seasons, but if he was, I'd still have plenty of confidence he'll eventually get us where we want to be. This could be our next Osborne, but as mentioned before, Frost isn't walking into a top 10 program like Osborne did. I think he can get us back to 9-4 within 3 seasons, if not sooner, but being in the playoff convo might end up being a decade out.
Big red surfers
New member
At least scott frost doesn't come in with a 21-25 record in his 46 games like Mr. Rodgers did.
cheekygeek
New member
I seriously think that Nebraskans will show more loyalty to a native Nebraskan head coach, that is likable and shows that he knows how to coach. By that I mean: Develop players, motivate them to show up on Game Days, understand clock management, (for example: run the ball when everybody in Memorial Stadium knows that you want to keep the clock moving or force the other side to use time outs), and represent the State of Nebraska well on the sideline and in the recruits living rooms. We know what wandering in the wilderness is about and we've seen what a poorly coached and motivated team looks like. It's not fun to watch. I guarantee you that Scott Frost Husker teams are going to be fun to watch again. May we never feel like we do about our prospects on Game Day again, as we feel today.
STL Husker
New member
I agree. The negativity from the fan base has a bigger impact than most think. This is a full out rebuild. This is our last real chance before we become the basketball program. Hopefully he gets Darin Erstad type leniency.
BIGREDIOWAN
Mods
I hope so, if I go to another game and hear someone boo next to me because he's not "turning it around" as fast as they'd like I might lose it.
I think we'll see a different Huskerboard than perhaps we've ever seen in terms of percentage of those focusing on the negative versus the positive. We'll see a lot more of the "sunshine pumpers". I may even become one.
Huskers93-97
New member
BIGREDIOWAN
Mods
As a mod I can't wait!!!! :lol:I think we'll see a different Huskerboard than perhaps we've ever seen in terms of percentage of those focusing on the negative versus the positive. We'll see a lot more of the "sunshine pumpers". I may even become one.
The Dude
New member
HuskermanMike
New member
That 2018 schedule is brutal, I would say going 9-3 with that schedule would be really impressive. My guess would be with Frosty at the helm we go 7-5 or 8-4 in year 1. Which is a step in the right direction.
STL Husker
New member
I'd say 6-6 is in the right direction, but I'm not going to make any expectations in his first year.
RedDenver
New member
There's no way he gets more than 4 years unless the Huskers are getting better. A losing season after year 1 is almost a certain firing. Frost will have to perform well if he wants 7+ years.
The Dude
New member
Yeah we find ourselves in a rare situation where 6-6 could be considered a positive. Which is why this is the perfect year to make a change.
bisonwiches
New member
- Status