Shitpost Central

[StPaulHusker]

I get a kick out of the fact that Scott Frost is the face of that 1997 team in all of these photos. He was NOT well received when he came back to Nebraska in 1996, after having spent his first couple of years at Stanford under Bill Walsh, but time heals all wounds. Most people have forgotten about that, especially after how well he played on the way to the 1997 National Championship.

He's not the "face." He's the jersey reference.

And he wasn't as good as you remember in 97.

 

[ColoradoHusk]

I get a kick out of the fact that Scott Frost is the face of that 1997 team in all of these photos. He was NOT well received when he came back to Nebraska in 1996, after having spent his first couple of years at Stanford under Bill Walsh, but time heals all wounds. Most people have forgotten about that, especially after how well he played on the way to the 1997 National Championship.

He's not the "face." He's the jersey reference.

And he wasn't as good as you remember in 97.

He developed a TON in '97 and by the end of the season, he was the vocal leader of the offense. His speech after the Orange Bowl was key in swaying voters to Nebraska in the final coach's poll.

 

[StPaulHusker]

I get a kick out of the fact that Scott Frost is the face of that 1997 team in all of these photos. He was NOT well received when he came back to Nebraska in 1996, after having spent his first couple of years at Stanford under Bill Walsh, but time heals all wounds. Most people have forgotten about that, especially after how well he played on the way to the 1997 National Championship.

He's not the "face." He's the jersey reference.

And he wasn't as good as you remember in 97.

He developed a TON in '97 and by the end of the season, he was the vocal leader of the offense. His speech after the Orange Bowl was key in swaying voters to Nebraska in the final coach's poll.

Really? His passing average was up 3% in 97 vs 96. But he threw for fewer yards, way fewer TD's and more INT's in 97. Lower passer rating too.

His running was much better.

I wouldn't go so far as to say A TON

 

[ColoradoHusk]

I get a kick out of the fact that Scott Frost is the face of that 1997 team in all of these photos. He was NOT well received when he came back to Nebraska in 1996, after having spent his first couple of years at Stanford under Bill Walsh, but time heals all wounds. Most people have forgotten about that, especially after how well he played on the way to the 1997 National Championship.

He's not the "face." He's the jersey reference.

And he wasn't as good as you remember in 97.

He developed a TON in '97 and by the end of the season, he was the vocal leader of the offense. His speech after the Orange Bowl was key in swaying voters to Nebraska in the final coach's poll.

Really? His passing average was up 3% in 97 vs 96. But he threw for fewer yards, way fewer TD's and more INT's in 97. Lower passer rating too.

His running was much better.

I wouldn't go so far as to say A TON

Osborne developed a whole new QB run game specifically for Frost in '97. It was unleashed at Washington and they (and many future opponents) didn't have an answer.

You can't look at Frost's passing stats. It was a totally different offense. He more than doubled his rushing yards in '97.

 

[knapplc]

I get a kick out of the fact that Scott Frost is the face of that 1997 team in all of these photos. He was NOT well received when he came back to Nebraska in 1996, after having spent his first couple of years at Stanford under Bill Walsh, but time heals all wounds. Most people have forgotten about that, especially after how well he played on the way to the 1997 National Championship.

He's not the "face." He's the jersey reference.
And he wasn't as good as you remember in 97.

He's the person they're using in these photos.

How good do I remember him from 1997?

 

[StPaulHusker]

I get a kick out of the fact that Scott Frost is the face of that 1997 team in all of these photos. He was NOT well received when he came back to Nebraska in 1996, after having spent his first couple of years at Stanford under Bill Walsh, but time heals all wounds. Most people have forgotten about that, especially after how well he played on the way to the 1997 National Championship.

He's not the "face." He's the jersey reference.

And he wasn't as good as you remember in 97.

He developed a TON in '97 and by the end of the season, he was the vocal leader of the offense. His speech after the Orange Bowl was key in swaying voters to Nebraska in the final coach's poll.

Really? His passing average was up 3% in 97 vs 96. But he threw for fewer yards, way fewer TD's and more INT's in 97. Lower passer rating too.

His running was much better.

I wouldn't go so far as to say A TON

Osborne developed a whole new QB run game specifically for Frost in '97. It was unleashed at Washington and they (and many future opponents) didn't have an answer.

You can't look at Frost's passing stats. It was a totally different offense. He more than doubled his rushing yards in '97.

Maybe we should discuss the word develop in your post. I see development of a QB as getting BETTER as a passer AND a runner. Not just succeeding as a runner in a system designed around you.

 

[ColoradoHusk]

I get a kick out of the fact that Scott Frost is the face of that 1997 team in all of these photos. He was NOT well received when he came back to Nebraska in 1996, after having spent his first couple of years at Stanford under Bill Walsh, but time heals all wounds. Most people have forgotten about that, especially after how well he played on the way to the 1997 National Championship.

He's not the "face." He's the jersey reference.

And he wasn't as good as you remember in 97.

He developed a TON in '97 and by the end of the season, he was the vocal leader of the offense. His speech after the Orange Bowl was key in swaying voters to Nebraska in the final coach's poll.

Really? His passing average was up 3% in 97 vs 96. But he threw for fewer yards, way fewer TD's and more INT's in 97. Lower passer rating too.

His running was much better.

I wouldn't go so far as to say A TON

Osborne developed a whole new QB run game specifically for Frost in '97. It was unleashed at Washington and they (and many future opponents) didn't have an answer.

You can't look at Frost's passing stats. It was a totally different offense. He more than doubled his rushing yards in '97.

Maybe we should discuss the word develop in your post. I see development of a QB as getting BETTER as a passer AND a runner. Not just succeeding as a runner in a system designed around you.

Don't you think that part of Osborne's decision to design an offense around Frost's running abilities had to do with Frost's overall improvement as a player? Osborne designed brand new offense plays based on Frost, which where college football ended up going in the early 2000's.

Frost was a huge reason that NU won the national championship in 1997. I saw it first-hand. I am sure you saw those games, as well. I am sorry if you have a stick up your butt towards the guy.

 

[StPaulHusker]

I get a kick out of the fact that Scott Frost is the face of that 1997 team in all of these photos. He was NOT well received when he came back to Nebraska in 1996, after having spent his first couple of years at Stanford under Bill Walsh, but time heals all wounds. Most people have forgotten about that, especially after how well he played on the way to the 1997 National Championship.

He's not the "face." He's the jersey reference.

And he wasn't as good as you remember in 97.

He developed a TON in '97 and by the end of the season, he was the vocal leader of the offense. His speech after the Orange Bowl was key in swaying voters to Nebraska in the final coach's poll.

Really? His passing average was up 3% in 97 vs 96. But he threw for fewer yards, way fewer TD's and more INT's in 97. Lower passer rating too.

His running was much better.

I wouldn't go so far as to say A TON

Osborne developed a whole new QB run game specifically for Frost in '97. It was unleashed at Washington and they (and many future opponents) didn't have an answer.

You can't look at Frost's passing stats. It was a totally different offense. He more than doubled his rushing yards in '97.

Maybe we should discuss the word develop in your post. I see development of a QB as getting BETTER as a passer AND a runner. Not just succeeding as a runner in a system designed around you.

Don't you think that part of Osborne's decision to design an offense around Frost's running abilities had to do with Frost's overall improvement as a player? Osborne designed brand new offense plays based on Frost, which where college football ended up going in the early 2000's.

Frost was a huge reason that NU won the national championship in 1997. I saw it first-hand. I am sure you saw those games, as well. I am sorry if you have a stick up your butt towards the guy.

There are no sticks. I just don't see him the same way others might.

 

[In the Deed the Glory]

I get a kick out of the fact that Scott Frost is the face of that 1997 team in all of these photos. He was NOT well received when he came back to Nebraska in 1996, after having spent his first couple of years at Stanford under Bill Walsh, but time heals all wounds. Most people have forgotten about that, especially after how well he played on the way to the 1997 National Championship.

He's not the "face." He's the jersey reference.

And he wasn't as good as you remember in 97.

He developed a TON in '97 and by the end of the season, he was the vocal leader of the offense. His speech after the Orange Bowl was key in swaying voters to Nebraska in the final coach's poll.

Really? His passing average was up 3% in 97 vs 96. But he threw for fewer yards, way fewer TD's and more INT's in 97. Lower passer rating too.

His running was much better.

I wouldn't go so far as to say A TON

Osborne developed a whole new QB run game specifically for Frost in '97. It was unleashed at Washington and they (and many future opponents) didn't have an answer.

You can't look at Frost's passing stats. It was a totally different offense. He more than doubled his rushing yards in '97.

Maybe we should discuss the word develop in your post. I see development of a QB as getting BETTER as a passer AND a runner. Not just succeeding as a runner in a system designed around you.

Don't you think that part of Osborne's decision to design an offense around Frost's running abilities had to do with Frost's overall improvement as a player? Osborne designed brand new offense plays based on Frost, which where college football ended up going in the early 2000's.

Frost was a huge reason that NU won the national championship in 1997. I saw it first-hand. I am sure you saw those games, as well. I am sorry if you have a stick up your butt towards the guy.

Frost had a very good year, in fact he was one of the few ever (at that time) that did the 1,000-1,000 season. The defense and Ahman Green were our biggest weapons that season. Green ran for 1800 yards and the defense had like 15 NFL players on the 2-deep.

 

[ColoradoHusk]

I get a kick out of the fact that Scott Frost is the face of that 1997 team in all of these photos. He was NOT well received when he came back to Nebraska in 1996, after having spent his first couple of years at Stanford under Bill Walsh, but time heals all wounds. Most people have forgotten about that, especially after how well he played on the way to the 1997 National Championship.

He's not the "face." He's the jersey reference.

And he wasn't as good as you remember in 97.

He developed a TON in '97 and by the end of the season, he was the vocal leader of the offense. His speech after the Orange Bowl was key in swaying voters to Nebraska in the final coach's poll.

Really? His passing average was up 3% in 97 vs 96. But he threw for fewer yards, way fewer TD's and more INT's in 97. Lower passer rating too.

His running was much better.

I wouldn't go so far as to say A TON

Osborne developed a whole new QB run game specifically for Frost in '97. It was unleashed at Washington and they (and many future opponents) didn't have an answer.

You can't look at Frost's passing stats. It was a totally different offense. He more than doubled his rushing yards in '97.

Maybe we should discuss the word develop in your post. I see development of a QB as getting BETTER as a passer AND a runner. Not just succeeding as a runner in a system designed around you.

Don't you think that part of Osborne's decision to design an offense around Frost's running abilities had to do with Frost's overall improvement as a player? Osborne designed brand new offense plays based on Frost, which where college football ended up going in the early 2000's.

Frost was a huge reason that NU won the national championship in 1997. I saw it first-hand. I am sure you saw those games, as well. I am sorry if you have a stick up your butt towards the guy.

There are no sticks. I just don't see him the same way others might.

Did he steal your girlfriend during your time at NU?

 

[StPaulHusker]

I get a kick out of the fact that Scott Frost is the face of that 1997 team in all of these photos. He was NOT well received when he came back to Nebraska in 1996, after having spent his first couple of years at Stanford under Bill Walsh, but time heals all wounds. Most people have forgotten about that, especially after how well he played on the way to the 1997 National Championship.

He's not the "face." He's the jersey reference.

And he wasn't as good as you remember in 97.

He developed a TON in '97 and by the end of the season, he was the vocal leader of the offense. His speech after the Orange Bowl was key in swaying voters to Nebraska in the final coach's poll.

Really? His passing average was up 3% in 97 vs 96. But he threw for fewer yards, way fewer TD's and more INT's in 97. Lower passer rating too.

His running was much better.

I wouldn't go so far as to say A TON

Osborne developed a whole new QB run game specifically for Frost in '97. It was unleashed at Washington and they (and many future opponents) didn't have an answer.

You can't look at Frost's passing stats. It was a totally different offense. He more than doubled his rushing yards in '97.

Maybe we should discuss the word develop in your post. I see development of a QB as getting BETTER as a passer AND a runner. Not just succeeding as a runner in a system designed around you.

Don't you think that part of Osborne's decision to design an offense around Frost's running abilities had to do with Frost's overall improvement as a player? Osborne designed brand new offense plays based on Frost, which where college football ended up going in the early 2000's.

Frost was a huge reason that NU won the national championship in 1997. I saw it first-hand. I am sure you saw those games, as well. I am sorry if you have a stick up your butt towards the guy.

There are no sticks. I just don't see him the same way others might.

Did he steal your girlfriend during your time at NU?

I hear he stole someone else's and she paid a hefty price for it.

 

[knapplc]

That's really uncalled for, SPH.

 

[ColoradoHusk]

I get a kick out of the fact that Scott Frost is the face of that 1997 team in all of these photos. He was NOT well received when he came back to Nebraska in 1996, after having spent his first couple of years at Stanford under Bill Walsh, but time heals all wounds. Most people have forgotten about that, especially after how well he played on the way to the 1997 National Championship.

He's not the "face." He's the jersey reference.

And he wasn't as good as you remember in 97.

He developed a TON in '97 and by the end of the season, he was the vocal leader of the offense. His speech after the Orange Bowl was key in swaying voters to Nebraska in the final coach's poll.

Really? His passing average was up 3% in 97 vs 96. But he threw for fewer yards, way fewer TD's and more INT's in 97. Lower passer rating too.

His running was much better.

I wouldn't go so far as to say A TON

Osborne developed a whole new QB run game specifically for Frost in '97. It was unleashed at Washington and they (and many future opponents) didn't have an answer.

You can't look at Frost's passing stats. It was a totally different offense. He more than doubled his rushing yards in '97.

Maybe we should discuss the word develop in your post. I see development of a QB as getting BETTER as a passer AND a runner. Not just succeeding as a runner in a system designed around you.

Don't you think that part of Osborne's decision to design an offense around Frost's running abilities had to do with Frost's overall improvement as a player? Osborne designed brand new offense plays based on Frost, which where college football ended up going in the early 2000's.

Frost was a huge reason that NU won the national championship in 1997. I saw it first-hand. I am sure you saw those games, as well. I am sorry if you have a stick up your butt towards the guy.

There are no sticks. I just don't see him the same way others might.

Did he steal your girlfriend during your time at NU?

I hear he stole someone else's and she paid a hefty price for it.

I did comment that a lot of football players didn't like Frost because of his role in the Phillips issues. If that's why you don't like him, I don't have an issue with that. I agree that Frost shouldn't have been messing with McEwen, given her relationship with LP, but what LP did was LP's fault. That issue still doesn't take away the fact that Frost played a huge role in winning the '97 National Championship. NU wasn't going to win it with Frankie London.

 

[StPaulHusker]

That's really uncalled for, SPH.

Too snarky for you?

 

[B.B. Hemingway]

I get a kick out of the fact that Scott Frost is the face of that 1997 team in all of these photos. He was NOT well received when he came back to Nebraska in 1996, after having spent his first couple of years at Stanford under Bill Walsh, but time heals all wounds. Most people have forgotten about that, especially after how well he played on the way to the 1997 National Championship.

He's not the "face." He's the jersey reference.

And he wasn't as good as you remember in 97.

He developed a TON in '97 and by the end of the season, he was the vocal leader of the offense. His speech after the Orange Bowl was key in swaying voters to Nebraska in the final coach's poll.

Really? His passing average was up 3% in 97 vs 96. But he threw for fewer yards, way fewer TD's and more INT's in 97. Lower passer rating too.

His running was much better.

I wouldn't go so far as to say A TON

Osborne developed a whole new QB run game specifically for Frost in '97. It was unleashed at Washington and they (and many future opponents) didn't have an answer.

You can't look at Frost's passing stats. It was a totally different offense. He more than doubled his rushing yards in '97.

Maybe we should discuss the word develop in your post. I see development of a QB as getting BETTER as a passer AND a runner. Not just succeeding as a runner in a system designed around you.

Don't you think that part of Osborne's decision to design an offense around Frost's running abilities had to do with Frost's overall improvement as a player? Osborne designed brand new offense plays based on Frost, which where college football ended up going in the early 2000's.

Frost was a huge reason that NU won the national championship in 1997. I saw it first-hand. I am sure you saw those games, as well. I am sorry if you have a stick up your butt towards the guy.

There are no sticks. I just don't see him the same way others might.

Did he steal your girlfriend during your time at NU?

I hear he stole someone else's and she paid a hefty price for it.

Meh, what's college if you're not banging someone else's girlfriend?