zoogs
New member
I notice this board seems more generous than most with the signatures - some of them are pretty out of control (not a huge fan, personally, of how 37's is five times longer than his posts, but breaking the horizontal plane on any reasonable monitor is I think, pretty clear across the line of reasonable.
Here's typ3kal, whose banner sig is about 1246 px wide...some members have brought it up in a thread he started.
Does this merit watching? Should we send him a short notice asking him to reduce the size by (say...at least) half? Since there aren't any hard or fast rules in place he didn't do anything wrong, and he might point out that some others have similarly ridiculous sigs. So should we leave it be for a while, come up with a general and lenient signature policy, and ask members to abide by it?
Here's typ3kal, whose banner sig is about 1246 px wide...some members have brought it up in a thread he started.
Does this merit watching? Should we send him a short notice asking him to reduce the size by (say...at least) half? Since there aren't any hard or fast rules in place he didn't do anything wrong, and he might point out that some others have similarly ridiculous sigs. So should we leave it be for a while, come up with a general and lenient signature policy, and ask members to abide by it?