NU jumper alum
New member
big backs are coming back in style...Penn State, OSU, Iowa, etc. This guy will fit right in
he might end up being 6'1 or 6'0. Seems like every prospect always is 1-2 inches less than there height listed on rivals (From 2012 westerkamp,michael rose, mcmullen, leroy alexander, moss, whitaker). Everyone other than whitaker and rose where off by 2 inches.He's a true 6'2" 206.... that's a big RB!
That's probably not a big deal. 6-2 is getting fairly tall for a RB. Closer to 6-0 wouldn't be a problem at all.he might end up being 6'1 or 6'0. Seems like every prospect always is 1-2 inches less than there height listed on rivals (From 2012 westerkamp,michael rose, mcmullen, leroy alexander, moss, whitaker). Everyone other than whitaker and rose where off by 2 inches.He's a true 6'2" 206.... that's a big RB!
I wouldn't mind that at allMy first thoughts when I watched his film, as well.Adrian Peterson
There's nothing wrong with short running backs. If they're built right, they're very difficult to tackle. Maurice Jones-Drew is a good example. I've seen him light up some pretty big linebackers before. 6' even is a decent height for a RB though.That's probably not a big deal. 6-2 is getting fairly tall for a RB. Closer to 6-0 wouldn't be a problem at all.he might end up being 6'1 or 6'0. Seems like every prospect always is 1-2 inches less than there height listed on rivals (From 2012 westerkamp,michael rose, mcmullen, leroy alexander, moss, whitaker). Everyone other than whitaker and rose where off by 2 inches.He's a true 6'2" 206.... that's a big RB!
I've that he is actually closer to 6'1 and not 6'2That's probably not a big deal. 6-2 is getting fairly tall for a RB. Closer to 6-0 wouldn't be a problem at all.he might end up being 6'1 or 6'0. Seems like every prospect always is 1-2 inches less than there height listed on rivals (From 2012 westerkamp,michael rose, mcmullen, leroy alexander, moss, whitaker). Everyone other than whitaker and rose where off by 2 inches.He's a true 6'2" 206.... that's a big RB!
If a RB is 5'9" like Abdullah, he is easier to get lost behind blockers and spring free. Barry Sanders did the same thing.There's nothing wrong with short running backs. If they're built right, they're very difficult to tackle. Maurice Jones-Drew is a good example. I've seen him light up some pretty big linebackers before. 6' even is a decent height for a RB though.That's probably not a big deal. 6-2 is getting fairly tall for a RB. Closer to 6-0 wouldn't be a problem at all.he might end up being 6'1 or 6'0. Seems like every prospect always is 1-2 inches less than there height listed on rivals (From 2012 westerkamp,michael rose, mcmullen, leroy alexander, moss, whitaker). Everyone other than whitaker and rose where off by 2 inches.He's a true 6'2" 206.... that's a big RB!
Didnt MJD light up Terrell Suggs on a goal line play?There's nothing wrong with short running backs. If they're built right, they're very difficult to tackle. Maurice Jones-Drew is a good example. I've seen him light up some pretty big linebackers before. 6' even is a decent height for a RB though.That's probably not a big deal. 6-2 is getting fairly tall for a RB. Closer to 6-0 wouldn't be a problem at all.he might end up being 6'1 or 6'0. Seems like every prospect always is 1-2 inches less than there height listed on rivals (From 2012 westerkamp,michael rose, mcmullen, leroy alexander, moss, whitaker). Everyone other than whitaker and rose where off by 2 inches.He's a true 6'2" 206.... that's a big RB!