SIGNED S Tre'Vell Dixon

Status
Not open for further replies.
HuskerShark said:
If we wants to be a receiver, then I want him N a little less. I would love to have him as a safety though.
Click to expand...
Maybe the staff already knows we are getting some 4-5-star DB recruit that will move to safety from arizona that is high on us??? That way there would be no need for Dixon to be at safety.

 
papio2chi said:
Dixon stated his top four:

Nebraska, Arizona State, TCU and Houston.

Wants to be a WR and that's what the schools are recruiting him for.
Click to expand...
I understand the kid may have some qualification issues... But does that top 4 make ANY SENSE?

If you look at it purely from a success on the field standpoint, we blow the other 3 schools away RIGHT NOW.

My guess is location and WOMENZZZ are being taken into account on this one though.

 
SeattleHuskers said:
I can understand the first three, but Houston?
Click to expand...
Location, location, location. Early playing time in what has historically been a wide open passing attack doesn't hurt, but never underestimate the role location plays in choosing a college (just like it does for most non-atletes).

 
As others have said you take him. Alonzo moore 2.0 with the ball in his hands.

The staff is fully onboard with the receiver idea.

 
I still think Alonzo Moore ought to be on defense. Hopefully he proves me wrong by cracking some playing time next year and showing what he is capable of with the ball in his hands.

 
I think he had his chance, we really want Clark as our slot reciever and we are only going to take 3...we got our 2 outside guys.

Wouldnt be opposed to taking him if he wanted to come thou, alot of spots to fill. Think we could take 28-30 if we wanted.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top