if in fact Suh (or any player for that matter) did spit on Daniel then he should be punished. That sort of behavior is intolerable.
However, i do find it interesting that Daniel said it happened in the pregame (no camera/video evidence).
Secondly, when would these two players have been close enough for Suh (or whoever) to spit on him?
Thirdly, its also interesting that they accused arguably our best defensive player of the crime.
Fourth, in my mind, if someone spits on another person and there are other people witnessing this, how does that not start some sort of altercation. I mean these two schools are bitter rivals, and this sort of thing would more than likely ignite some sort of dispute.
To me, there a just too many fishy things about this for me to believe it happened without hard evidence. I'm not saying that every NU player is an angel but I find this hard to believe.