I see one of the 3 QBs leaving after spring, so the coaches are looking at the backups to see who is 2, 3 & 4.I agree that it is Tommy's job today. And I might be reading into it. But for the most part I take Riley's comments at face value. He's been honest so far. He's a QB whisperer. More reps for the other QBs the rest of the way is what he said. I don't want there to be a QB problem, but I cannot rule it out completely at this early stage. So we will see what happens. The spot is open for the taking though.Hm, I thought they have been pretty strong about Tommy's hold on the job as an incumbent (but allowing that the battle isn't over). Lately, he's just been out. I don't think I could read more into it than that.
That is one heck of a lot of assumption based on a snap shot of one throw from each. No QB throws perfectly every time and no QB at this level throws poorly every time. You don't know what the normal throwing motion is of a guy is by a snap shot of one throw.You can even tell from these two pics that one guy is much more natural throwing the ball.
+1. I feel exactly the same way. It seems like the first time a coach has a bad game everybody goes into knee-jerk reaction mode and calls for his head. But the penalty for coaching changes is absolutely huge. Generally it means losing most of the recruiting class, something that affects the team for three or four years going forward. And we end up with players who may not have the skill set to run the new guys offense and defense. And finally, regardless of how well our players are suited to running the new schemes, they will still need to learn whole new playbooks on each side of the ball. Basically, anytime we change coaches we can plan on flushing one or two seasons down the shitter. That, and having to pay out several million in buyout money. So I'm generally the last guy to call for a coaches head.That's the game that sealed the deal with me on getting rid of him.this was just one game where Bo sh#t the bed........exit, stage left for Bodacious!
It took me a long time to get to that point due to me HATING coaching changes. One of the reasons is what this thread is about. Coaching changes means changes in scheme and systems (more times than not). This means key players that could be good if coached well in the current system all of a sudden become liabilities to the system only because they are the wrong type of player for the new system.
I honestly don't care if we run a power run/option attack, spread attack, or a pro style attack. I have my preferences on what I like to watch the most but, truth be told, there have been programs win championships in all three of those systems and I firmly believe all three can be successful now with the right coaches.
The problem we have had is that we didn't have experts in teaching and coaching the system we were trying to run. I firmly believe we had talent to do better than we did. But, it is clear to me that certain members of the coaching staff were holding the program back (Mainly the HC that was a nutcase).
So....now we have a coaching change. (For which I am extremely excited about.) Fans and administrators think the old system stinks so we must have drastic change. Bring in a new thought process. This has happened when Solich was replaced. It happened when Callyclown was replaced. Now it's happened when Bo has been replaced.
So...we potentially are going to go through a couple years of adjustment (I'm not convinced 100% that we will but it's possible) and if so, we will have a certain amount of the fan base clamoring for coaches to be fired because they haven't won anything in their first 2-3 years. If they would have their way we would then have yet another coaching change with a complete change in philosophy and scheme and once again we will end up with players not matching the scheme.
It's a vicious circle. Heck, we already have fans on here that flat out claim if this staff doesn't win at least 10 games next year they are going to start sharpening their pitchforks to run them out of town. AFTER THEIR FIRST YEAR!!!! It's just asinine.
Meanwhile, programs that are successful, try to match the coach to the system they are running and the continuity of success more times than not continues. Oregon is a perfect example of that. The system works. Go find an expert in running it and that can continue running it.
I agree. It's probable they want extra looks to see who they can work with. The most important position in football is not going to be handed over if there are too many question marks.I think we don't have a starting qb as of today or else he would want to get the leader the most reps with the 1s, would he not?
Mike Riley proved he wasn't past benchING ppl with Cody Vaz and Mannion
Interesting. Who would it be? Surely it wouldn't be Stanton or Bush leaving because the opportunity to start is right in front of them for the taking.I see one of the 3 QBs leaving after spring, so the coaches are looking at the backups to see who is 2, 3 & 4.I agree that it is Tommy's job today. And I might be reading into it. But for the most part I take Riley's comments at face value. He's been honest so far. He's a QB whisperer. More reps for the other QBs the rest of the way is what he said. I don't want there to be a QB problem, but I cannot rule it out completely at this early stage. So we will see what happens. The spot is open for the taking though.Hm, I thought they have been pretty strong about Tommy's hold on the job as an incumbent (but allowing that the battle isn't over). Lately, he's just been out. I don't think I could read more into it than that.
Bush. A week into spring Mike Riley said he throws a beautiful ball. That's high praise enough. Aside from that, I'm not sure Bush has the internal toughness that TA has out on the field. TA is very competitive, a physical runner with a strong arm. But it's smarts (knowing where to go with the ball) and accuracy (getting the ball there) that Riley and Langsdorf have mentioned several times with what they want from a QB. It makes sense.Who's the more natural thrower?
I think Stanton would leave if he is behind Bush after Spring practice. It would take a lot for Armstrong to get beat out in the fall, and if Stanton is still #3, then I could see him going some place closer to Cali and a system that would use his running ability.I agree. It's probable they want extra looks to see who they can work with. The most important position in football is not going to be handed over if there are too many question marks.I think we don't have a starting qb as of today or else he would want to get the leader the most reps with the 1s, would he not?
Mike Riley proved he wasn't past benchING ppl with Cody Vaz and Mannion
Interesting. Who would it be? Surely it wouldn't be Stanton or Bush leaving because the opportunity to start is right in front of them for the taking.I see one of the 3 QBs leaving after spring, so the coaches are looking at the backups to see who is 2, 3 & 4.I agree that it is Tommy's job today. And I might be reading into it. But for the most part I take Riley's comments at face value. He's been honest so far. He's a QB whisperer. More reps for the other QBs the rest of the way is what he said. I don't want there to be a QB problem, but I cannot rule it out completely at this early stage. So we will see what happens. The spot is open for the taking though.Hm, I thought they have been pretty strong about Tommy's hold on the job as an incumbent (but allowing that the battle isn't over). Lately, he's just been out. I don't think I could read more into it than that.
Your're right. It's just a crazy coincidence that every pick post of TA is depicting bad mechanics. The photographers have it out for him.That is one heck of a lot of assumption based on a snap shot of one throw from each. No QB throws perfectly every time and no QB at this level throws poorly every time. You don't know what the normal throwing motion is of a guy is by a snap shot of one throw.You can even tell from these two pics that one guy is much more natural throwing the ball.
You can even tell from these two pics that one guy is much more natural throwing the ball.
Bush has his upper arm fully extended away from his body. 180 degree angle (or more) between his chest and his upper arm with the shoulder as the fulcrum. His upper arm is angled upwards as he prepares to deliver a more over-the-top throw with a high release point. Also, his lower arm is laid all the way back so the ball is almost behind his shoulder which causes the ball to be pointed almost vertically. His body is already leaning slightly to his right as he is beginning to transfer his weight to his right foot and drive the ball now that he has created a lot of "lag" between his right shoulder and his left elbow (similar to a golfer lagging the clubhead behind their hands just before reaches impact)....I can't tell. So this would have to be explained to me.
The receiver is at the same spot coming off the shadow.You can even tell from these two pics that one guy is much more natural throwing the ball.
Are you sure they aren't catching the ball?You can even tell from these two pics that one guy is much more natural throwing the ball.