Staff Changes

ScarletRevival said:
Quick math, in the 90 year period from 1869-1959 Nebraska had zero claimed National Championships and average less than 1 win per year more than each of those 3 programs.

If you'd like to consider that to be head and shoulders above those programs then we will have to agree to disagree.

Thanks for doing the leg work, though.
Click to expand...


Well, we didn't start playing until 1890. We could claim a National Championship if we wanted in 1902 where we didn't have a point scored on us all year. We also could claim it for undefeated seasons in 1903, 1913, and 1915 or with dominant teams with tough schedules in 1921, 1922, and 1933 without much controversy. We're were so much better than those guys even before Devaney got here. Don't look up Michigan, Ohio State, Michigan State, or Minnesota though. They were killers in the 30s, 40s, and 50s.

macroboy said:
Did somebody think they just won an argument by quoting our record from 1890 to 1940?

It would be hard to find better proof of how far we have fallen than that right there.

who f@;$(&::ng cares?!?!
Click to expand...


The point somebody made was that Nebraska was only Devaney and Osborne with a barren wasteland outside of those 40 years. That is objectively untrue. Nebraska has a long, dominant football tradition. We have as many exceptional years as Notre Dame, Alabama, Oklahoma, USC, Michigan, or Ohio State. And...why wouldn't you care about history. Notre Dame is in the playoff and talks about the 4 Horsemen and George Gipp and Knute Rockne. Alabama can't stop talking about their Mount Rushmore of coaches with Wallace Wade, Frank Thomas, Bear Bryant, and Nick Saban. Michigan has 1997 as the only National Championship since Jackie Robinson played for the Dodgers and still acts like they are one of only two teams in the Big 10.

College football is a story of continuity of teams despite a turnover of players. It's unique in that way unlike any other sport.

 
The_Fan_Man said:
The point somebody made was that Nebraska was only Devaney and Osborne with a barren wasteland outside of those 40 years. That is objectively untrue. Nebraska has a long, dominant football tradition. We have as many exceptional years as Notre Dame, Alabama, Oklahoma, USC, Michigan, or Ohio State. And...why wouldn't you care about history. Notre Dame is in the playoff and talks about the 4 Horsemen and George Gipp and Knute Rockne. Alabama can't stop talking about their Mount Rushmore of coaches with Wallace Wade, Frank Thomas, Bear Bryant, and Nick Saban. Michigan has 1997 as the only National Championship since Jackie Robinson played for the Dodgers and still acts like they are one of only two teams in the Big 10.

College football is a story of continuity of teams despite a turnover of players. It's unique in that way unlike any other sport.
Click to expand...


I always love this little fact when the Four Horsemen are brought up:

"During the three-year tenure of the Four Horsemen, Notre Dame lost only two games; one each in 1922 and 1923, both to Nebraska in Lincoln before packed houses."  (from Wikipedia)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lightfighter214 said:
Im gonna be honest. Im confused,  our only real issue on defense was pass rush.

I feel like i dont watch the same team as some of these guys sometimes. 
Click to expand...
Same.  I'm guessing a typo to OLB (pass rush?).  I'd be thrilled to have Honas back.  Reimer and Henrich are shaping up to be really good IMHO.  Don't disagree with the O changes at all.  I'd really like a lot of the seniors on D (and CTB) to come back.

 
I think Stryker's article was spot on.  There has got to be some hard choices made.  If we go into spring ball with no changes, I think apathy sets in big time.  No changes means the same crazy results that we have not seen for 3 years wt Frost and 6 years since Bo was fired.

I especially Amen these comments of Styker's

1.  Replace Coach V with a special teams coach

2. Scott Frost - relinquish the play calling role

3. Scott Frost - take over coaching QBs if he thinks he has to coach a unit.   I'd prefer that he be a CEO and not get bogged down with coaching a specific unit because I could see him being distracted during the game wt his QBs while the D is on the field.

 I think our biggest weakness on D was lack of a pass rush.  Not sure if that is coaching, lack of experience, lack of talent or scheme.  Would 4-3 be better?  At this point, I'm willing to give the D a break as it seemed to improve over the last year and we see some promising young talent being developed.  Coaching changes must happen on the O side of the ball I believe.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
SECHusker said:
Good read by Stryker.

https://www.huskermax.com/stryker-find-consistency-lose-the-drama-emphasize-the-run-solve-special-teams/

Really hope changes are made on offense and ILB.
Click to expand...


I thought this was a great read into where we are today, as a program and going forward. 

I think we are maybe 1 pass rusher away from being one of the top D in the west. No one is going to shut down the offenses of today, totaly. 

We do have to be able score in the red zone, besides f/g. Better power running might help that. Play calling in the red zone is still hard to understand.

GBR!!!

 
huskered17 said:
I thought this was a great read into where we are today, as a program and going forward. 

I think we are maybe 1 pass rusher away from being one of the top D in the west. No one is going to shut down the offenses of today, totaly. 

We do have to be able score in the red zone, besides f/g. Better power running might help that. Play calling in the red zone is still hard to understand.

GBR!!!
Click to expand...
I agree. But you should be able to have a very solid defense even if you dont recruit like Bama and Ohio State. Look at what Northwestern does. If we could be Northwestern on defense and Scott get his offense rolling. Look out.

 
SECHusker said:
Good read by Stryker.

https://www.huskermax.com/stryker-find-consistency-lose-the-drama-emphasize-the-run-solve-special-teams/

Really hope changes are made on offense and ILB.
Click to expand...
Tough to find much I disagree with in this article. At the very least, I think it's asking a lot of the right questions, particularly about Coach V and the offense's inability to find consistency. I really resonated with the comment about trying to roll back some of the horizontal components of this offense. We've seen too many swing passes or perimeter bubble screens result in TFL's, minimal gains or turnovers. Perhaps it can come back if the players can execute it well, but in three seasons, it hasn't been proven.

Personally, I'm not concerned about Duval and overall S&C. It seems like we've made a lot of improvements in three seasons (particularly with seeing less Husker players down on the field after plays like we did in 2017, but I don't have the #'s in front of me to prove that). I also think that this was one of the faster and stronger looking NU teams I've seen in some time, but strength and speed don't do much for you when you're not getting the mental and fundamental parts of the game right.

This is also division one football in the Big 10. Almost everybody is fast and strong. Games against a Rutgers where you just wear them down with a pounding, physical rushing attack in the 4th quarter are rare.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Enhance said:
Tough to find much I disagree with in this article. At the very least, I think it's asking a lot of the right questions, particularly about Coach V and the offense's inability to find consistency. I really resonated with the comment about trying to roll back some of the horizontal components of this offense. We've seen too many swing passes or perimeter bubble screens result in TFL's, minimal gains or turnovers. Perhaps it can come back if the players can execute it well, but in three seasons, it hasn't been proven.

Personally, I'm not concerned about Duval and overall S&C. It seems like we've made a lot of improvements in three seasons (particularly with seeing less Husker players down on the field after plays like we did in 2017, but I don't have the #'s in front of me to prove that). I also think that this was one of the faster and stronger looking NU teams I've seen in some time, but strength and speed don't do much for you when you're not getting the mental and fundamental parts of the game right.

This is also division one football in the Big 10. Almost everybody is fast and strong. Games against a Rutgers where you just wear them down with a pounding, physical rushing attack in the 4th quarter are rare.
Click to expand...
I agree. I think if we had a consistent running game up the middle and a downfield passing threat those bubble screens and swing passes would open up. But we have neither so they dont work. 

 
SECHusker said:
Yes. It has taken far too long to develop any level of consistency, they still miss gaps, and they are a liability in the passing game. In comparison to the improvements made by the other units, the lag behind.
Click to expand...
Disagree.  They still missed some plays, but until Miller and then Reimer got hurt, this was arguably the best unit on a solid defense this year. You also had the #4 guy going back and forth with OLB because of depth there. The jump ILB made from last year was definitely the biggest of any position group. The athleticism is still a question, but I think that is improving as well.

 
Open Question:  are you all comfortable wt our S&C program?   I wonder if some of our inability to close out and win games comes down to our physical condition.  Were other teams just that much more physical than us and we were worn out and out of gas?

Of course physicality is more than S&C it is also attitude and that could play into it as well. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lightfighter214 said:
Im not a chin fan, but on the list of things that plague this team, besides pass rush, nothing defensive is in the Top 10.
Click to expand...
agree - the D kept is in games for the most part this year.  I don't think the O played one complete game this year.

 
Back
Top