No need to assume. The board rules are fairly straight forward. Rhetorically bellyaching about it in a thread doesn't help anything and usually causes more problems.
I’m sure that’s it. Could possibly be anything else. Maybe keep the personal attacks to your self next time. It’s pretty easy to tell you have no argument once you resort to them.
You could, you know, explain why Trump was able to keep worldwide gas prices lower via his majestic and magical abilities. By doing so, you can enlighten us on how Republicans plan to address this problem once they take power this fall.
Not concerned. Just tired of you spending more time being annoying than just answering peoples questions when asked.
It wasn’t a personal attack at all. It was a question with two choices. If there’s a 3rd option, I’m all ears but I’m guessing explaining it will just reinforce the ill informed option.
Okay, so an obvious hit piece with the same old sorry excuse that Biden should be increasing domestic production, even though he doesn’t control the oil companies and they currently have thousands of leases they could be drilling right now but aren’t, is your argument….
Okay….So I’m not going to argue, at all, about being warned about my prior post (even though it was phrased as a question with an answer option that was not a personal attack) but what on earth was possibly, remotely wrong with this post?
No, not at all. But the response to a crisis in the US shouldn't be so snarky. How about working together? You, instead, have a long history of being a finger pointer. That's actual factual.
