Tangent Thread - September 2017 Edition

Well since you're gonna base your entire attack on strawman arguments and feel victimized by something that had nothing to do with you, I thought it was prudent to at least set the stage for you to do it correctly.


What strawman?  You literally called out "douches" who object to the "trophy."  Only after I bring it up do you try and correct yourself.  It was a weak attempt by you.  Which isn't surprising.  

 
What strawman?  You literally called out "douches" who object to the "trophy."  Only after I bring it up do you try and correct yourself.  It was a weak attempt by you.  Which isn't surprising.  
You are saying I was directing it at you. You're the only one who felt it was directed at you. Everyone else understood what I meant.

 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Really?  You read this---"Who's gonna be a douche and oppose it now?"-- as referring to the Athletic Administration and not an ambiguous call out to anyone who did oppose the "trophy"

Pretty weak.




Yes. When I read the post I thought it was snark against the AD, as they're the bad guys in this whole thing.

I don't know what that means as far as being weak (I'm weak? My reading comprehension is weak? Weak argument? What?), but that's how I honestly took it without second thought, and clearly I'm not the only one.

The tangent thread should be in the woodshed so people can properly be called out on creating these sorts of things. Good grief.

 
smashheadintoyourcomputergif.gif~c200


 
If you saw me drowning, would you accuse me of hating water?
You're a silly goose. I'll reply to Mich instead.

The person putting their head through the screen was me when MR was hired.
I'm leaning toward an offense that the guys can learn in the time allotted. The fancy pro offenses look great but we're never able to pull it off. Even Oregon's razzle dazzle offense of a couple years ago got smashed by the top teams. That's all.

 
Back
Top