TE Reese Leitao [Texas - Signed LOI]

To which school will Leitao commit?


  • Total voters
    49
Career record at Texas will be: 33-27.

PeeWee Herman ain't ready for that Texas Culture.

Book It.
Is this is a coping mechanism for individuals who have a hard time losing recruits?
I'm okay with losing Leitao. Just pointing out the facts and issues that go with Texas football.
Well I guess if you say those are facts. What's Nebraska's record gonna be in that time frame? Or do you only know Texas' future?

 
Herman is a great coach now with fantastic fan support, wealth, facilities, and a national brand at his disposal. I think he does well.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
LOL.

Who was more successful at their previous job and at a higher conference level?

Strong or Herman?

Louisville or Houston?

Don't paint the picture one way brotha.

Let's see how Herman does, but he ain't great yet.

 
Career record at Texas will be: 33-27.

PeeWee Herman ain't ready for that Texas Culture.

Book It.
Is this is a coping mechanism for individuals who have a hard time losing recruits?
I'm okay with losing Leitao. Just pointing out the facts and issues that go with Texas football.
Well I guess if you say those are facts. What's Nebraska's record gonna be in that time frame? Or do you only know Texas' future?
Lol.

Meant that it's a fact Texas has a difficult culture surrounding it.

 
Lol, that's the problem with kids these days. It goes for our commits too, commits everywhere.

"I'm currently committed to..." as if the word commitment implies some temporary resolution.
I've been saying for years that the problem isn't the kids or how they're conducting their recruiting, but the use of the word "commitment" itself. It's the wrong word because in recruiting it is indeed a temporary resolution. Signing the LOI is a commitment, verbally saying you're probably going to a school is not.

Part of the problem is in finding a word to replace it with: intention? loose agreement? place holder? Anybody got a word that means "intends to do something but is not committed to it"?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
LOL.

Who was more successful at their previous job and at a higher conference level?

Strong or Herman?

Louisville or Houston?

Don't paint the picture one way brotha.

Let's see how Herman does, but he ain't great yet.
He produced at Houston and upped their talent level in year 1 on the job. Pretty safe pick that he does well in a pedestrian Big 12.
 
LOL.

Who was more successful at their previous job and at a higher conference level?

Strong or Herman?

Louisville or Houston?

Don't paint the picture one way brotha.

Let's see how Herman does, but he ain't great yet.
He produced at Houston and upped their talent level in year 1 on the job. Pretty safe pick that he does well in a pedestrian Big 12.
Young blood dropping truth. Bravo
 
Lol, that's the problem with kids these days. It goes for our commits too, commits everywhere.

"I'm currently committed to..." as if the word commitment implies some temporary resolution.
I've been saying for years that the problem isn't the kids or how they're conducting their recruiting, but the use of the word "commitment" itself. It's the wrong word because in recruiting it is indeed a temporary resolution. Signing the LOI is a commitment, verbally saying you're probably going to a school is not.
Part of the problem is in finding a word to replace it with: intention? loose agreement? place holder? Anybody got a word that means "intends to do something but is not committed to it"?
 
Back
Top