carlfense
New member
Hear, hear.I do disagree with your last sentence since I see Obama as the better of two bad options ...
I'll take an average president like Obama over Willard every single day.
Hear, hear.I do disagree with your last sentence since I see Obama as the better of two bad options ...
so only when you were explicitly told you were learning critical thinking skills, you were learning critical thinking skills?Oh, I understood and learned all about biology, botany, algebra, calculus, and trig without having "critical thinking" mentioned once in those classrooms.I don't think that you can adequately "get" science and mathematics without first understanding how to think critically.
No one can really be surprised that Texas Republicans oppose critical thinking. Libertarians, republicans and religious nuts would be out of work if too many people actually start to question things and examine the nonsense they're asked to believe.
Believe things like these?
"The private sector is just fine"
"You didn't build it."
Hopefully there's going to be a guy out of his current job on 20 January because of this kind of nonsense he's been spouting.
You make rote recall sound like a crime of some sort. Next time you see your doctor, ask him about medical school and the method they use.I suppose you expect an argument, but you won't get one from me, although I do disagree with your last sentence since I see Obama as the better of two bad options (precisely the way I felt with every vote I've cast for the last 25 years). As for the other bits, blindly believing whatever is said by any politician in general, or American politicians in particular is foolish. That blind acceptance is what both politically parties and every religion in the world rely on.Oh, I understood and learned all about biology, botany, algebra, calculus, and trig without having "critical thinking" mentioned once in those classrooms.
Believe things like these?
"The private sector is just fine"
"You didn't build it."
Hopefully there's going to be a guy out of his current job on 20 January because of this kind of nonsense he's been spouting.
Edit to add a response to your edited addition: A student may very well memorize all of the concepts and be able to recall them for exams. Rote recall isn't the same as truly understanding a subject, though. That's why I made the distinction of being able to "get" a subject.
When I was told I was learning math, I was learning math. Again, all of this is good only if a person leaves school with acquired knowledge that helps them do more than just be sensitive and open-minded. Plus, it's good if he or she knows the difference between "your" and "you're." It makes them appear to be less imbecilic.so only when you were explicitly told you were learning critical thinking skills, you were learning critical thinking skills?Oh, I understood and learned all about biology, botany, algebra, calculus, and trig without having "critical thinking" mentioned once in those classrooms.I don't think that you can adequately "get" science and mathematics without first understanding how to think critically.
No one can really be surprised that Texas Republicans oppose critical thinking. Libertarians, republicans and religious nuts would be out of work if too many people actually start to question things and examine the nonsense they're asked to believe.
Believe things like these?
"The private sector is just fine"
"You didn't build it."
Hopefully there's going to be a guy out of his current job on 20 January because of this kind of nonsense he's been spouting.
they learn and understand how the systems work so they can figure out and understand the millions of complexities that might be causing the problem.You make rote recall sound like a crime of some sort. Next time you see your doctor, ask him about medical school and the method they use.I suppose you expect an argument, but you won't get one from me, although I do disagree with your last sentence since I see Obama as the better of two bad options (precisely the way I felt with every vote I've cast for the last 25 years). As for the other bits, blindly believing whatever is said by any politician in general, or American politicians in particular is foolish. That blind acceptance is what both politically parties and every religion in the world rely on.Oh, I understood and learned all about biology, botany, algebra, calculus, and trig without having "critical thinking" mentioned once in those classrooms.
Believe things like these?
"The private sector is just fine"
"You didn't build it."
Hopefully there's going to be a guy out of his current job on 20 January because of this kind of nonsense he's been spouting.
Edit to add a response to your edited addition: A student may very well memorize all of the concepts and be able to recall them for exams. Rote recall isn't the same as truly understanding a subject, though. That's why I made the distinction of being able to "get" a subject.
As for "getting" a subject, I "got" calculus by memorizing the rules (as you do in most math courses). There's not a lot of room for self expression. Like my instructor told me, "Taking this course will do nothing except make you a better person." Plus, it filled a math requirement.
I'm doing no such thing. I simply pointed out the fact that there is a significant difference between rote memorization and having an actual understanding of a subject. That's not really a debatable point. Rote memorization is an important aspect of learning, but there's more to mastery (the "getting" it part) than just being able to recall facts, methods and formulas.You make rote recall sound like a crime of some sort. Next time you see your doctor, ask him about medical school and the method they use.
As for "getting" a subject, I "got" calculus by memorizing the rules (as you do in most math courses). There's not a lot of room for self expression. Like my instructor told me, "Taking this course will do nothing except make you a better person." Plus, it filled a math requirement.
so, to you, the sole purpose of critical thinking skills is to combat 'insensitivity' and 'closed-mindedness'. and no one is disagreeing that the schools could be better, but just because this is not the biggest problem does not mean that it is not worth discussion. i believe you are demonstrating the 'nirvana fallacy'.All I am saying is that with the the U.S. education system has bigger problems than insensitivity and closed-mindedness. Of course, bashing Texans is always great fun, so carry on.
So you're saying we need to adopt Southeastern Pennsylvania's educational philosophies? (Not trying to make a Penn St. joke here, that's central Penn)Band of Brothers analogy...
How Texas wants their kids educated - Lt Sobel
If kids in Texas were allowed to think on their own - Lt Winters
I'm not sure if you quite understand what critical thinking is.All I am saying is that with the the U.S. education system has bigger problems than insensitivity and closed-mindedness. Of course, bashing Texans is always great fun, so carry on.