Because the author writes articles means the author is an expert on whatever he wrote about?!?!
Jim Cramer has a freaking TV show on investing and people make fortune investing inverse Cramer. Just as an example.
Yesterday a story re-emerged about the Duke Lacross case and the lady finally admitting she lied. The author of The Rolling Stones articles on the subject years back was damn sure the author was correct in those “incorrect” articles. Just as an example.
CNN had soooooo many “experts” on in regards to the 2017-2018 Russia/trump story claiming all these salacious details that ended up not being correct, wrote website articles for CNN that weren’t correct and ended up being confirmed as not correct by internet sleuths who ended up knowing more then those “expert” authors. Just as an example.
When authors focus on specific subjects for a period of time doing extensive research, like his SAT research, an author can be considered an expert in the subject. But one must also accept that an expert isn’t beyond reproach or being wrong. I don’t see how Nick is an expert though on politics elections or the economy based on his prior writings.