The Courts (not specific to either party)

Nebraska Dems need to realize they aren’t California Dems.  They have been unhitched from “defending the indefensible” in Nebraska.  I’m thinking more and more this could be good if played right.

 
Archy1221 said:
Ok, then use a rubber, IUD, birth control, shot, etc… I would disagree with banning the morning after pill though.  
Click to expand...
Hey, I simply answered your question. You asked if they banned contraceptives and then stated you viewed the morning after pill as a contraceptive. So yeah, I guess they did allow the banning of contraceptives. But then you proceeded to do what so many republicans are want to do nowadays and, completely unsolicited, started in with advice on which alternate contraceptives others should use. How about you and your party stay out of people’s bedrooms? I know, it’s a pipe dream…..but still.

 
I totally get the "use protection' bit but like...have some of you just never f#&%ed and protection was not right there when you did it?  

I know we have some dorks here, myself being the biggest of them all, but like...it happens.  

Sidenote...had a roomie years ago who bought some Magnums, which I think are for dudes with HOGS...he said they did not fit him because he was so big...so he gave them to me, clearly they fit me with super major room to spare.  

 
teachercd said:
I totally get the "use protection' bit but like...have some of you just never f#&%ed and protection was not right there when you did it?  

I know we have some dorks here, myself being the biggest of them all, but like...it happens.  

Sidenote...had a roomie years ago who bought some Magnums, which I think are for dudes with HOGS...he said they did not fit him because he was so big...so he gave them to me, clearly they fit me with super major room to spare.  
Click to expand...
My god I hope my wife isn’t secretly following me here…

But in college, drunker than s#!t, a hot (to me) girl rips of the condom and says “im on the pill for a reason!”  Is there a “5 second” rule for std’s? Because I think I was done at that point and came away clean!

 
funhusker said:
My god I hope my wife isn’t secretly following me here…

But in college, drunker than s#!t, a hot (to me) girl rips of the condom and says “im on the pill for a reason!”  Is there a “5 second” rule for std’s? Because I think I was done at that point and came away clean!
Click to expand...
Didn't you go to an all guy college?  I thought you said that???

Hahhaha

 
I banged (sorry, made love) this one girl who insisted on a rubber (total prude) anyway, it was dark in my room (only the red light from the video camera was on) and I put one on, she felt my dong to make sure I was not lying!!!

Anyway, if you are interested she did two porns for College Girls Exploited, if you want to know the fake name she used, let me know!

 
JJ Husker said:
Hey, I simply answered your question. You asked if they banned contraceptives and then stated you viewed the morning after pill as a contraceptive. So yeah, I guess they did allow the banning of contraceptives. But then you proceeded to do what so many republicans are want to do nowadays and, completely unsolicited, started in with advice on which alternate contraceptives others should use. How about you and your party stay out of people’s bedrooms? I know, it’s a pipe dream…..but still.
Click to expand...
I think you missed the part where I would disagree if they banned that morning after pill.  Go have a beef with someone else about it.  

 
Archy1221 said:
I think you missed the part where I would disagree if they banned that morning after pill.  Go have a beef with someone else about it.  
Click to expand...
That’s fine but maybe quit acting like this ruling didn’t affect contraceptives. You do this a lot, throw out some gotcha questions and then when your assumptions are proven false you continue to act like your assumptions were well founded.

 
JJ Husker said:
That’s fine but maybe quit acting like this ruling didn’t affect contraceptives. You do this a lot, throw out some gotcha questions and then when your assumptions are proven false you continue to act like your assumptions were well founded.
Click to expand...
You ok?!?  One would assume that just because I consider the morning after pill a contraceptive based off an either or choice you gave, doesn’t mean a state or others consider it a contraceptive.  
 

BTW…..you do this a lot, as in get things wrong.  Notice it’s not banned?  

https://www.womenshealthmag.com/health/a39945228/plan-b-ban/

 
Archy1221 said:
You ok?!?  One would assume that just because I consider the morning after pill a contraceptive based off an either or choice you gave, doesn’t mean a state or others consider it a contraceptive.  
 

BTW…..you do this a lot, as in get things wrong.  Notice it’s not banned?  

https://www.womenshealthmag.com/health/a39945228/plan-b-ban/
Click to expand...


I've noticed Republicans play this game A LOT.

People have well-justified concerns about some of the increasingly extremist positions the GOP holds on various issues. Defenders swoop in to cry foul and claim anyone with those fears are just being hyperbolic alarmists.

Just like the did with Roe. "They said it's settled law. Worrying about Roe is ridiculous."

Then it happens and nobody owns up to anything they said before.

Claiming they won't go after Griswold or Eisenstadt (which enshrine the right to contraceptives) on the basis "Alito said he won't" is lunacy.

Because, like the vast majority of politicians, the conservatives on SCOTUS are gutless liars and hypocrites who only care about the power they can wield and to what ends.

 
Back
Top