The Democrat Utopia

Which part?  The part with reasonable and sensible regulations on things that should be regulated included the one at the end Democrats actually don’t want to age regulate  :dunno

Ya I guess that part. 




I don't know if it's a trollish nature or an echo chamber you might live in that puts you out of touch with reality, but it's not a left talking point or position that kids should have access to gender surgeries without the involvement and signing off and recommendation of their parents and physicians.

 
I don't know if it's a trollish nature or an echo chamber you might live in that puts you out of touch with reality, but it's not a left talking point or position that kids should have access to gender surgeries without the involvement and signing off and recommendation of their parents and physicians.


I don't know if it's a trollish nature or an echo chamber you might live in that puts you out of touch with reality, but it's not a left talking point or position that kids should have access to gender surgeries without the involvement and signing off and recommendation of their parents and physicians.
It’s possible it’s a trollish nature or you didn’t notice the video was a parody and that it wasn’t from an actual hidden camera of an actual event.  
Or that I clearly said age regulate in the post you replied to and I didn’t say not signing off by a physician which one clearly has to sign off on in order to provide the surgical procedure or drug treatment to make one more feminine or more masculine.  
It is a left talking point to allow that to happen under the age of 18.  That’s not in dispute.  

 
It is a left talking point to allow that to happen under the age of 18.  That’s not in dispute.  


If it's what the child and their parents and their physician think is best.

Yet your video that starts with the kid being refused a tattoo because they're a minor ends with them asking for genital surgery and the guy pulls out a hacksaw and says sure no problem!

So can you breakdown how that "sound about right for the majority of the blue pillers"? The parody is quite clear, the logic isn't.

 
If it's what the child and their parents and their physician think is best.
What if they think it’s best to get a tattoo in CA at age 16?  
 

Yet your video that starts with the kid being refused a tattoo because they're a minor ends with them asking for genital surgery and the guy pulls out a hacksaw and says sure no problem!
It’s not actually my video, it’s one I posted and It’s sarcastic :lol:  

it highlights the states that will not allow a tattoo even with parental consent yet allows life altering puberty meds or looping off someones body part.  Who knows, maybe that’s not life altering in a blue pill world :dunno
 

So can you breakdown how that "sound about right for the majority of the blue pillers"? The parody is quite clear, the logic isn't.
What are you even going for here?  

 
it highlights the states that will not allow a tattoo even with parental consent yet allows life altering puberty meds or looping off someones body part.  Who knows, maybe that’s not life altering in a blue pill world :dunno
 

What are you even going for here?  


It doesn't actualy highlight either of the two bolded

What are you even going for here?  




Mostly that good satire works because it's fairly close to a 1:1 analogy of something in the real world, and your video (thanks for pointing it out but I wasn't actually confused about whether or not you were actually Lucky f#&%in McGee‎ on twitter posting original content you made yourself) breaks down and fails at its goal the second you try to apply a logical consistency to it.

For the sake of providing encouragement for all of us to do better, here's what a pretty good piece of satire looks like:


 
A story about some poor guy in New York that got stabbed to death by another dude has been making its rounds on the news cycle.  
 

Apparently his friends started a go fund me within a day……..oh sorry, not for funeral expenses or his family etc…..for themselves  :lol:

 
What if they think it’s best to get a tattoo in CA at age 16?  
 

It’s not actually my video, it’s one I posted and It’s sarcastic :lol:  

it highlights the states that will not allow a tattoo even with parental consent yet allows life altering puberty meds or looping off someones body part.  Who knows, maybe that’s not life altering in a blue pill world :dunno
 

What are you even going for here?  
Ummmm, age is a choice, it is a spectrum. 

 
Back
Top