Guy Chamberlin
Active member
I figured you'e have some disdain for my extremely pragmatic and humane positions.
Imagine the US embraced the moral compass of Northern California.
I dunno, man. I grew up and went to college in Nebraska, then moved to Northern California. I still spend a lot of time with family and friends in Nebraska, and have Republican friends and fond memories in both states.
I moved to San Francisco for career reasons, and defended my home state against the coastal elites by claiming Nebraskans were nicer, more honest, more pragmatic, and much better drivers than the smug Californians. Over the years I realized this wasn't exactly true, even if it felt right to say. In the ways that really count, my San Francisco neighborhood had more small town values than I grew up with in Nebraska; I walked to the butcher shop, the hardware store, the liquor store, and the bakery, where they knew my name and my preferences. My fellow Nebraskan and I lived in a building with six flats, and came to socialize with each one. Good folks. When I moved to equally liberal Marin County to raise a family, I met plenty of other people of good character and community values. To this day I can't find any significant difference in the pragmatism, humanity, morality, and niceness between the people of California and the people of Nebraska. Our state politics may seem more silly, but it's not like Nebraska didn't veer off into extremes and identity politics of its own.
But that's anecdotal. If you really wanted to find a moral compass you'd need to get data-driven. If your measure is teen-pregnancy, drug use, divorce, education levels, and reliance on the federal government, you're not gonna like what the red states are turning out.