Correct, I am not.He’s not really.
He’s not really.
Correct, I am not.
Just pointing out that the "dear leader" crowd is not anywhere close to "1/2 the Country"
If anything, the legislature should amend the original endangered species law to remove the word "fish" since the act was written to protect invertebrates, which the court said also includes non-marine invertebrates since snails for example were already protected under the same act.This gave me laugh. A court in the confused state of California decides a honey be can be a fish for endangered species protection. :laughpound the legislature should pass a law declaring the honey bee is an endangered species instead of interpreting a law in nonsensical ways? It makes the court look goofy. My wife and I are bee keepers. It takes effort to keep those colonies going. There are times you have to sacrifice a couple thousand to rid the colony of mites. Let’s hope this new protection of bee-fish doesn’t go overboard.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/california-court-bumblebee-fish-environmental-law
Looks like I'm wrong about removing the word "fish", it's more that the California legislature created a confusing definition of fish. Here's a pretty good breakdown:If anything, the legislature should amend the original endangered species law to remove the word "fish" since the act was written to protect invertebrates, which the court said also includes non-marine invertebrates since snails for example were already protected under the same act.
https://www.sacbee.com/news/california/article262045952.html
“Fish” means a wild fish, mollusk, crustacean, invertebrate, amphibian, or part, spawn, or ovum of any of those animals.
Cal. Fish & Game Code § 45.
Insects are invertebrates. And this didn’t seem to be limited to aquatic beasts, the court held, because of that goddamn snail, which is terrestrial. Nobody had ever complained about it being on the list. If the Legislature cared about the aquaticness of invertebrates, the court seems to have reasoned, it would have done something about this, but it didn’t. Therefore, nonaquatic invertebrates can be on the list, and that’s what bumblebees are.
This is why, at least for purposes of California’s section 45, bees are fish.
If you want more, there’s a wonderful discussion of worms on page 34 of the opinion, but I need a drink.
Muellers mandate was to prove Russian collution and nail Trump.
What was it then?
Are you talking about Melania and their marriage?it was baked in that there would be no nailing of Trump no matter what from the very start.