The Democrat Utopia

FWIW... the killer had the right plan to get away with it.  He is in far right texas.   Abbot will pardon him and the far right will glorify him for shooting a BLM protester.   

 
Scarlet said:
What's pathetic?  He was found guilty of murder by a jury of his peers.  Are you saying a jury trial is pathetic?  Or that he killed an innocent man?  Or that he'd probably not be going to jail if he hadn't had an twitchy trigger finger?  Or if he hadn't incited a response from the protesters by driving his car into the protest? 

The video in the Twitter thread you posted doesn't show anything other than him driving rapidly into to protest, people responding and gunshots break out immediately.  FAFO it seems to me but I wasn't in the jury and neither were you or the Daily Caller source you provided complete with the racist/antisemitic tropes like "BLM mob" and "Soros-backed DA".  

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.kxan.com/news/local/austin/daniel-perry-found-guilty-of-murder-in-protesters-death/amp/

Just to provide some context into your martyr.  
Click to expand...
it'people forget that the DA can only bring charges...it's a jury that convicts.   

 
Guy Chamberlin said:
Is it possible that a far right influencer misrepresented much of the incident in order to fuel partisan outrage, and one of our HuskerBoard brethren passed it along as pathetic fact? 
Click to expand...
he seems to be cheering for the guy who said someone could and should drive into a protest and claim self defense who later drove into a crowd with a gun and shot someone who wasn't shooting at him and claimed self defense.. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Scarlet said:
What's pathetic?  He was found guilty of murder by a jury of his peers.  Are you saying a jury trial is pathetic?  Or that he killed an innocent man?  Or that he'd probably not be going to jail if he hadn't had an twitchy trigger finger?  Or if he hadn't incited a response from the protesters by driving his car into the protest? 

The video in the Twitter thread you posted doesn't show anything other than him driving rapidly into to protest, people responding and gunshots break out immediately.  FAFO it seems to me but I wasn't in the jury and neither were you or the Daily Caller source you provided complete with the racist/antisemitic tropes like "BLM mob" and "Soros-backed DA".  

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.kxan.com/news/local/austin/daniel-perry-found-guilty-of-murder-in-protesters-death/amp/

Just to provide some context into your martyr.  
Click to expand...


"Racist Tropes."  Meanwhile, Biden's thoughts on KKK's Robert Byrd: "He was a mentor and a friend, and for a lot of us, he was a guide."

BLM has nothing to do with supporting black lives.  Such a progressive group.  

You sound like you'd love Austin.  Thankfully it looks very little like most of TX.

*When Louisiana is on the trip itinerary from San Antonio to Dallas

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is the guy who goes running into the crowd the one who does the shooting. I never heard about this, and the video is confusing. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yea, that's bad.  You're significantly swimming upstream if you're posting that stuff and this situation happens.  Even if the actual shooting situation that night happened where he could've used justifiable force, the posts are a terrible look.

That said, it seems that the APD investigator testified for the Defense.  And the D.A. went through around six Grand Juries to find one that would indict.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/austin-murder-trial-begins-army-sergeant-who-claims-shot-armed-protester-self-defense-2020

The indictment itself was not without controversy. Detective David Fugitt, the well-respected lead investigator in the case who is known locally as the "godfather of the homicide unit," claimed in a sworn affidavit in August 2021 that prosecutors under Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza, one of several district attorneys who have been funded by leftwing billionaire George Soros, forced him to remove exculpatory evidence from his presentation to the grand jury. 
 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
DefenderAO said:
Yea, that's bad.  You're significantly swimming upstream if you're posting that stuff and this situation happens.  Even if the actual shooting situation that night happened where he could've used justifiable force, the posts are a terrible look.

That said, it seems that the APD investigator testified for the Defense.  And the D.A. went through around six Grand Juries to find one that would indict.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/austin-murder-trial-begins-army-sergeant-who-claims-shot-armed-protester-self-defense-2020

The indictment itself was not without controversy. Detective David Fugitt, the well-respected lead investigator in the case who is known locally as the "godfather of the homicide unit," claimed in a sworn affidavit in August 2021 that prosecutors under Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza, one of several district attorneys who have been funded by leftwing billionaire George Soros, forced him to remove exculpatory evidence from his presentation to the grand jury. 
 
Click to expand...
And yet where it mattered - a trial - the jury convicted him. And when you announce you're going to go kill people and then you do - that's premeditation - not just "swimming upstream" or "a terrible look".

 
RedDenver said:
And yet where it mattered - a trial - the jury convicted him. And when you announce you're going to go kill people and then you do - that's premeditation - not just "swimming upstream" or "a terrible look".
Click to expand...
The 6th jury they could find, after five others wouldn't indict, convicted him.

And OJ walked.

He'll likely be pardoned.  And I guess you didn't like this part; I'll post again.

The indictment itself was not without controversy. Detective David Fugitt, the well-respected lead investigator in the case who is known locally as the "godfather of the homicide unit," claimed in a sworn affidavit in August 2021 that prosecutors under Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza, one of several district attorneys who have been funded by leftwing billionaire George Soros, forced him to remove exculpatory evidence from his presentation to the grand jury. 
 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top