You might consider the tweet to be in jest.do you honestly think the target of distraction is the case of Sam Bankman-Fried?

You might consider the tweet to be in jest.do you honestly think the target of distraction is the case of Sam Bankman-Fried?
It was posted in hopes you would take the time to reply to a post about “nothing” :lol: . (A joke. Covering my bases for when you try to report for trolling).But still charging with everything else…
https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2023/07/27/doj-will-not-pursue-campaign-finance-charge-against
Were you trying to make some kind of point? Or were you just posting because you thought folks here might be interested in nothing?
You might consider the tweet to be in jest.![]()
Okay. So going with pointless post excuse. Got it :thumbsYou might consider the tweet to be in jest.![]()
Oh! So trolling! Or can I just say “no offense” before I call you a bunch of names?It was posted in hopes you would take the time to reply to a post about “nothing” :lol: . (A joke. Covering my bases for when you try to report for trolling).
It is Interesting that your take on illegal campaign contributions is “it’s nothing”.
For all others, on its face, it’s a pretty sweet thing for Sam when other citizens have been charged and convicted on the same count. One less thing to worry about and have come to trial (I’m sure the folks who got the donations are quite happy this won’t have a trial with evidence being talked about in the news).
You should actually spend a few seconds researching these things. I never even heard of this guy. So I did a quick Google to see what your post might be about since you didn’t leave much of a comment.It was posted in hopes you would take the time to reply to a post about “nothing” :lol: . (A joke. Covering my bases for when you try to report for trolling).
It is Interesting that your take on illegal campaign contributions is “it’s nothing”.
For all others, on its face, it’s a pretty sweet thing for Sam when other citizens have been charged and convicted on the same count. One less thing to worry about and have come to trial (I’m sure the folks who got the donations are quite happy this won’t have a trial with evidence being talked about in the news).
The far majority of his political donations fall in the Democrat utopiaverse. If you would like to move it to the Republican Utopia or Trump legal troubles thread feel free.I just considered your decision to post it in The Democrat Utopia and the likelihood it wasn't really in jest at all.
Good post here. No misinformation or misdirection at all. Nice!I have no doubt you did.
Ya no kidding. That info is well known. It’s also quite convenient to not have the charge listed in the extradition agreement. One would assume, our government would know how that agreement works now wouldn’t they. Just like the bribery charge he now won’t face. Conveniently saves some embarrassment for politicians.But the Bahamas wasn’t going to go through with extradition because that charge wasn’t in the agreement
ok. Thank you I guessGood post here. No misinformation or misdirection at all. Nice!
No problem. I think it’s good to recognize improvement when it’s seen.ok. Thank you I guess
Makes complete sense.No problem. I think it’s good to recognize improvement when it’s seen.
The far majority of his political donations fall in the Democrat utopiaverse. If you would like to move it to the Republican Utopia or Trump legal troubles thread feel free.
The jest was assuming people knew talking about UFO’s wasn’t actually a cover to avoid people talking about this.
As there are media professionals strategizing on how to minimize the Hunter Story, gin up faux Florida education stories, faux don’t say gay stories, to help the guy you voted for win again :dunno Exciting times we haveYet there actually are media professionals strategizing how Hunter Biden, UFOs and Barbie can help divert attention from the daily escalation of bad news for the guy you voted for twice.