The Democrat Utopia

and blue man cool is heading the country into WW3 yet i know it's painful for his fans to admit he WAS & IS the worst president ever. I mean you want to talk evidence? I think the case is and was settled by 76 million voters so yes, he and his fans are on the losing side. Lost the White House, Lost the Senate, Lost the Supreme Court, the Senate leader denied an attempt at appointing 3 appellate judges and ofc, the orange man also kept control of the house... So, all your evidence is meaningless to the majority. He's litterally on camera at the podium saying protest "peacefully"... but hey, journalistic liars (note here, I'm calling journalists liars) believe lies are more credible then truth. They deny truths on a regular basis. 

 
Loe Doesnt Know said:
Millions of dollars spent on an attempt to discredit a political rival washed down the drain... lol, bye bye lawsuits!!! Hopefully the media Bias ends too. Maybe, just maybe (hopefully) Musk is inquiring into what MSNBC might sell for and maybe, just maybe, we can get real journalism back on the air airways because right now, there's zero journalistic honesty in the nightly news. I say close them all down and start over from scratch with no bias and no fear of addressing a focused drive on populism with fact instead of conjecture. (I know, reading and learning hurts the brain.)

Because y'all often troll my posts I'll actually include the definitions to the bold lettering so anyone reading understands the post in it's entirety. 

Populism:

Defined as: 

  • a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups."the question is whether he will tone down his fiery populism now that he has joined the political establishment"

Conjecture:

Defined as:

  • an opinion or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete information.

    "conjectures about the newcomer were many and varied"

Click to expand...
Thank you for once more proving you don’t know what is going on. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Loe Doesnt Know said:
Conjecture is fitting.. Another post without any sort of actual content or rebuttal.
Click to expand...
This is more of a question than a rebuttal, but reading the post the @BigRedBuster quoted, how are you comfortable with right wing media and Donald Trump?  I get that MSNBC is a joke at night, no argument there.  But to pretend the Elon Musk, Donald Trump, and the GOP are champions of unbiased media and not a populist movement is laughable on its face.

 
Morning @funhusker

Again, you make an assumption. Re-read my post. I literally stated "all" media needs to be scrapped including Fox and Newsmax.. I don't trust a single mainstream media person currently and it's why I like Redacted. They (Natalie and Clayton) left their high paying, high profile, highly censored careers behind because they want to be journalists.

 
Loe Doesnt Know said:
Morning @funhusker

Again, you make an assumption. Re-read my post. I literally stated "all" media needs to be scrapped including Fox and Newsmax.. I don't trust a single mainstream media person currently and it's why I like Redacted. They (Natalie and Clayton) left their high paying, high profile, highly censored careers behind because they want to be journalists.
Click to expand...
I understand your post.  Just curious why you think electing Trump and asking Elon to buy these companies has any possibility of achieving what you would like to see?   Trump is by far the most populist candidate to run for office in 60 years and Musk is proving himself to be very biased towards the right.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
funhusker said:
I understand your post.  Just curious why you think electing Trump and asking Elon to buy these companies has any possibility of achieving what you would like to see?   Trump is by far the most populist candidate to run for office in 60 years and Musk is proving himself to be very biased towards the right.
Click to expand...
Because change is needed. I'm not afraid of change, hence why you've never read a post where I attack DEI on it's principles. I do call out the far left and far right on their stupidity though. (Ex: San Jose State Volleyball) Change is needed in "all" media. If Musk purchases MSNBC and enforces real journalism I don't think anyone that is moderate and centrists would complain. It's time to get bias out of journalism and change is needed. Shut them all down and start over from scratch. Hold journalists accountable and if they're caught reporting with a politically leaning agenda terminate them. Report the facts, provide researchable links in free news letters and let the readers/listeners decide their views.

 
Loe Doesnt Know said:
Because change is needed. I'm not afraid of change, hence why you've never read a post where I attack DEI on it's principles. I do call out the far left and far right on their stupidity though. (Ex: San Jose State Volleyball) Change is needed in "all" media. If Musk purchases MSNBC and enforces real journalism I don't think anyone that is moderate and centrists would complain. It's time to get bias out of journalism and change is needed. Shut them all down and start over from scratch. Hold journalists accountable and if they're caught reporting with a politically leaning agenda terminate them. Report the facts, provide researchable links in free news letters and let the readers/listeners decide their views.
Click to expand...
I'm hopefully misinterpreting your intent, but to me it sounds like you are wanting to see government regulated "free speech".  To expect Elon, or people like him, to buy business and force "real journalism" is just pure fantasy.  He even joked that if he bought it it would be to ridicule the left's agenda.

It would be nice if news was "just the news", but unfortunately we have opened pandora's box with the internet and social media.  It is pretty much impossible at this point in society to tell people to not share their thoughts on the internet.  And tv companies are happy to make money off of those opinions.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It sounds like this is only going to happen if Trump repeals the federal tax credit, and California institutes their own to make other EV's more affordable and bring in new competitors to the market without giving all of CA's money away.  There is a reason Musk is upset.

"It’s unclear at this point how the repeal of a $7,500 EV tax credit would affect nationwide EV sales, though Musk has claimed that it would actually come to the benefit of Tesla, as other automakers rely more heavily on the credit for sales."

https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-excluded-california-ev-rebates/#google_vignette

 
funhusker said:
It sounds like this is only going to happen if Trump repeals the federal tax credit, and California institutes their own to make other EV's more affordable and bring in new competitors to the market without giving all of CA's money away.  There is a reason Musk is upset.

"It’s unclear at this point how the repeal of a $7,500 EV tax credit would affect nationwide EV sales, though Musk has claimed that it would actually come to the benefit of Tesla, as other automakers rely more heavily on the credit for sales."

https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-excluded-california-ev-rebates/#google_vignette
Click to expand...
There is no specifics yet, as the details will get sorted out by CA's legislature, which may include Tesla and everyone else that might get left out.  This is all going to be a s#!t show of power struggles.  Welcome to America....

https://autos.yahoo.com/california-proposes-own-ev-buyer-011550035.html

 
Just a reminder the Democrats engage in performative art when governing.   Forgive us all if we pay no attention to their other BS arguments either.   Thank you for being one of the Adults in the room the past four years Senator Sinema and not allowing the Democrats to undo a necessary guardrail.  
 


 
Back
Top