The dire famine forecast is by a Stanford biologist who predicts it because of population increases and lack of population control not climate change. It's even conveniently highlighted.
The everyone will disappear in a blue cloud of steam is by the same biologist as the previous one (Paul Ehrlich), and is about population control, lack of food resources, and pollution contamination - again not climate change.
The next link is at least from a scientist at NCAR, who predicts that by about 2033 we'll consume more oxygen in the US than the green plants in the US can provide. I'm not sure if that's currently true or not, but I doubt it. His prediction that we'll end up boiling dry all the rivers and lakes in the continental US is laughable though. Definitely a crackpot.
The next article is again by Paul Ehrlich from the first two articles.
Scanning the rest it looks like there's about 5 articles on global cooling and/or a coming ice age. All of them are from 1971-1978 and all wrongly state that the global average temperature was declining when in actuality it was high in the 1940's, so went down in the 1950's but was increasing from the 1950's onward. I haven't dug into the researchers that the articles are referencing, but it looks like either bad scientific reporting or bad science by the researchers.
There's some acid rain articles that have nothing to do with climate change.
There's some about increasing droughts and more hot days in the summer, which have both come true.
There's some articles about islands losing ground due to rising sea levels, which have also come true.
There's an article about the Arctic becoming free of ice, which is also coming true.
I might have missed a couple, but basically there's some articles by Paul Ehrlich, who isn't a climate scientist and isn't talking about climate change, the crackpot NCAR scientist, and the bad science in the 1970's predicting an ice age because they somehow weren't actually looking at the data. But the rest are predicting what's actually happening.
