Trump can be criticized as much as anyone wants. 90% of news concerning Trump is negative (that’s published data) so we definitely get plenty of it.
Maybe I will make sure to sign off all my posts with Orange Man bad, CheetoHead, Trump sucks, Trump probably did it too, with every post I make so everyone is happy.
This conversation isn’t about Trump or the Georgia Dem. This thread has turned to a conversation about your lack of self awareness or trolling. Not sure which because both would be on point.
You do you!
Hmmmm. Posting a story about Warnock asking if this is the best Dems can do is now considered trolling. :thumbs
Simple. Trumpers criticizing someone for being accused of abusing women is laughable. When it clearly was only posted because you are sick of having the guy you support accused of rape.
I’ve been told that when this was being done, the Republicans were doing nothing but cowering to liberals and that’s why the new Trump party is do awesome. No way are they going back to negotiation and agreeing on things.
A central NE editorial weighs in
The last sentence of the article was spot on. The rest of the article, not so much. It seems to paint Trump as the victim, which is complete BS. It's a narrative that is pretty much what I would expect, though, from a cultural diversity-deficient rural Nebraska community.
I don’t watch “the news”.
What exactly is the topic? I’m not sure. The thread is on the Georgia Runoff Election, but we’re now apparently discussing Trump and his relationship with the media. To answer your question, it is my strong belief that the general lack of cultural diversity is why most rural areas of midwestern states are redder than red when it comes to politics. I’m not saying it’s wrong or right, just what I believe to be true. It comes from my personal experience growing up in one of these diversity deficient towns and now, for the past 25 years, reside in a larger metro area. So that article from the Kearney Hub is really not surprising to me in the way that it describes Trump battling and in some cases being victimized by the media (left), while making no mention of how the right wing media has continuously hammered the Clintons, Obamas and now Bidens. It would have been have been a pretty good article had it addressed that side of the problem too, but it didn’t. In my opinion, Right bias was there, even only if in a somewhat subtle way. And it’s too bad because closing sentence of the article was stated very well and is something I wish more people would realize. Unfortunately, I fear that many of the good folks in and around Kearney reading this will only take this as further affirmation that CNN and MSNBC, etc are “one-sided” and that is why the media is “wrong.”