The "Outrageously Idiotic Past the Point of Comprehension" Statements Thread

[ZRod]

The only time in history that we've ran an option offense was under Frank Solich.

i really do not understand the point of this post. first it is said that neb. does not have an offensive identity and if you search for such, some articles that come up are about when we ran the option offense, which we no longer do. loms states that we have ran option plays recently. which was not very relevant and not being debated; we were discussing identity. then he mentions the above quote, which is inaccurate and a non sequitur. just a bizarre progression.

The point was to disagree and argue for the sake of arguing. Basically, to troll.

Oh, so what you do everyday on this board?

 

[NUpolo8]

The only time in history that we've ran an option offense was under Frank Solich.

i really do not understand the point of this post. first it is said that neb. does not have an offensive identity and if you search for such, some articles that come up are about when we ran the option offense, which we no longer do. loms states that we have ran option plays recently. which was not very relevant and not being debated; we were discussing identity. then he mentions the above quote, which is inaccurate and a non sequitur. just a bizarre progression.

The point was to disagree and argue for the sake of arguing. Basically, to troll.

Oh, so what you do everyday on this board?

Thank you for posting

 

[ZRod]

The only time in history that we've ran an option offense was under Frank Solich.

i really do not understand the point of this post. first it is said that neb. does not have an offensive identity and if you search for such, some articles that come up are about when we ran the option offense, which we no longer do. loms states that we have ran option plays recently. which was not very relevant and not being debated; we were discussing identity. then he mentions the above quote, which is inaccurate and a non sequitur. just a bizarre progression.

The point was to disagree and argue for the sake of arguing. Basically, to troll.

Oh, so what you do everyday on this board?

Thank you for posting

The boy may have chosen his defense poorly, but the fact remains you would still be arguing semantics. There are those who consider what Osborne ran an option offense and there are others who consider it power running that incorporated the option. Either way we use the f'ing option then and now.

 

[Abdullah the Butcher]

I heard we played some form of street ball on grass.

 

[sd'sker]

The boy may have chosen his defense poorly, but the fact remains you would still be arguing semantics. There are those who consider what Osborne ran an option offense and there are others who consider it power running that incorporated the option. Either way we use the f'ing option then and now.

no one was arguing that we run option plays. that is why what he said was such nonsense.

 

[RedRedJarvisRedwine]

The boy may have chosen his defense poorly, but the fact remains you would still be arguing semantics. There are those who consider what Osborne ran an option offense and there are others who consider it power running that incorporated the option. Either way we use the f'ing option then and now.

no one was arguing that we run option plays. that is why what he said was such nonsense.

Its your fault for trying to make sense of it. Trying to comprehend things and find the logic on this board should get you banned! Imo

 

[Count 'Bility]

Am i the only one that knows that landlord was being a smartass with the solich comment? And now he's sittin back laughin. Jeebus. Some yall need a fresh tampon.

 

[ZRod]

As a corollary, I also googled "Nebraska's offensive scheme". I got several articles detailing how they're searching for one, a bunch on the option (which isn't ran anymore by Nebraska, obviously), and some articles on Tom Osborne, who isn't the coach anymore.

Doesn't seem like that much nonsense to me. Again it's semantics. Polo said we don't run the option any more which LLOMS interpreted as polo saying we don't run option plays anymore. If you want to get all technical Polo probably should have said we don't run the option offense anymore, but LLOMS probably should have taken the context of the conversation into consideration before jumping in. Here I am being reasonable on husker board again...

 

[sd'sker]

As a corollary, I also googled "Nebraska's offensive scheme". I got several articles detailing how they're searching for one, a bunch on the option (which isn't ran anymore by Nebraska, obviously), and some articles on Tom Osborne, who isn't the coach anymore.

Doesn't seem like that much nonsense to me. Again it's semantics. Polo said we don't run the option any more which LLOMS interpreted as polo saying we don't run option plays anymore. If you want to get all technical Polo probably should have said we don't run the option offense anymore, but LLOMS probably should have taken the context of the conversation into consideration before jumping in. Here I am being reasonable on husker board again...

it's not semantics, it is context. and within the context, it is hard to misinterpret. but that fact is that lloms was arguing just to argue. kind of like i am with you now, i guess.

 

[ZRod]

As a corollary, I also googled "Nebraska's offensive scheme". I got several articles detailing how they're searching for one, a bunch on the option (which isn't ran anymore by Nebraska, obviously), and some articles on Tom Osborne, who isn't the coach anymore.

Doesn't seem like that much nonsense to me. Again it's semantics. Polo said we don't run the option any more which LLOMS interpreted as polo saying we don't run option plays anymore. If you want to get all technical Polo probably should have said we don't run the option offense anymore, but LLOMS probably should have taken the context of the conversation into consideration before jumping in. Here I am being reasonable on husker board again...

it's not semantics, it is context. and within the context, it is hard to misinterpret. but that fact is that lloms was arguing just to argue. kind of like i am with you now, i guess.

se·man·tics noun plural but singular or plural in construction \si-ˈman-tiks\


: the study of the meanings of words and phrases in language

: the meanings of words and phrases in a particular context

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/semantics



Can we keep arguing?

 

[sd'sker]

As a corollary, I also googled "Nebraska's offensive scheme". I got several articles detailing how they're searching for one, a bunch on the option (which isn't ran anymore by Nebraska, obviously), and some articles on Tom Osborne, who isn't the coach anymore.

Doesn't seem like that much nonsense to me. Again it's semantics. Polo said we don't run the option any more which LLOMS interpreted as polo saying we don't run option plays anymore. If you want to get all technical Polo probably should have said we don't run the option offense anymore, but LLOMS probably should have taken the context of the conversation into consideration before jumping in. Here I am being reasonable on husker board again...

it's not semantics, it is context. and within the context, it is hard to misinterpret. but that fact is that lloms was arguing just to argue. kind of like i am with you now, i guess.

se·man·tics noun plural but singular or plural in construction \si-ˈman-tiks\


: the study of the meanings of words and phrases in language

: the meanings of words and phrases in a particular context

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/semantics



Can we keep arguing?

if you want to argue the meaning of semantics with semantics.

 

[ZRod]

As a corollary, I also googled "Nebraska's offensive scheme". I got several articles detailing how they're searching for one, a bunch on the option (which isn't ran anymore by Nebraska, obviously), and some articles on Tom Osborne, who isn't the coach anymore.

Doesn't seem like that much nonsense to me. Again it's semantics. Polo said we don't run the option any more which LLOMS interpreted as polo saying we don't run option plays anymore. If you want to get all technical Polo probably should have said we don't run the option offense anymore, but LLOMS probably should have taken the context of the conversation into consideration before jumping in. Here I am being reasonable on husker board again...

it's not semantics, it is context. and within the context, it is hard to misinterpret. but that fact is that lloms was arguing just to argue. kind of like i am with you now, i guess.

se·man·tics noun plural but singular or plural in construction \si-ˈman-tiks\


: the study of the meanings of words and phrases in language

: the meanings of words and phrases in a particular context

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/semantics



Can we keep arguing?

if you want to argue the meaning of semantics with semantics.

I'd prefer a discussion with some more context.

 

[ADS]

More like SEMENtics

Nailed it

 

[ZRod]

More like SEMENtics

Nailed it

It's this kind of mature and well cultured humor that the board has been missing lately.

 

[ADS]

Just here to help