The "Outrageously Idiotic Past the Point of Comprehension" Statements Thread

Big plays are great, but we're not going to get them against better defenses. Is it seriously that stupid and incomprehensible to want a QB that has both a great arm in conjunction with good decision making ability?
we are getting them because teams are selling out to stop the run. but the kind has a 7:1 td to int. ratio and has played pretty well. hopefully he learns to find his check down. that seems like something you develop through experience. but it seems like people are trying to incessantly discount him just for missing a check down even though he still is putting up pretty good stats.

and i guess i threw that post in here because "an effective ball" seems like a very specific pass that some people only care about.
You keep focusing on that f'ing 7:1 stat against our weakest competition of the year, but what about last year when the stat was 9/8? I'm not saying we replace him, just that I want him to IMPROVE AS A QB. Am I prone to exaggeration? Yes but I thought that was pretty f'ing well known by this point. But no, because I don't think he's the second coming of f'ing Jesus I'm a f'ing retard.

But you know what, I give up. You're right TA has 0 improvement to make, and I definitely would rather see him throw into triple coverage instead of a wide open AA. GBR!
to say you are prone to exaggeration is a bit of an understatement.

 
Big plays are great, but we're not going to get them against better defenses. Is it seriously that stupid and incomprehensible to want a QB that has both a great arm in conjunction with good decision making ability?
we are getting them because teams are selling out to stop the run. but the kind has a 7:1 td to int. ratio and has played pretty well. hopefully he learns to find his check down. that seems like something you develop through experience. but it seems like people are trying to incessantly discount him just for missing a check down even though he still is putting up pretty good stats.

and i guess i threw that post in here because "an effective ball" seems like a very specific pass that some people only care about.
You keep focusing on that f'ing 7:1 stat against our weakest competition of the year, but what about last year when the stat was 9/8? I'm not saying we replace him, just that I want him to IMPROVE AS A QB. Am I prone to exaggeration? Yes but I thought that was pretty f'ing well known by this point. But no, because I don't think he's the second coming of f'ing Jesus I'm a f'ing retard.

But you know what, I give up. You're right TA has 0 improvement to make, and I definitely would rather see him throw into triple coverage instead of a wide open AA. GBR!
to say you are prone to exaggeration is a bit of an understatement.
I think you might be exaggerating your feelings of an understatement

 
Don't know why, maybe it is his name, but something makes me root for this kid. I was shouting his name as loud as I could at the game, not sure how much they can hear out on the field. Ryker Fyfe sounds like a spy name. He should be starting.
Spy name moves him up the depth chart? Sounds legit.

default_laugh.png


 
Last edited by a moderator:
I haven't a clue what thread to put this in, and it really doesn't belong here, but NUpolo8 ragging on people who are ragging on Tommy Armstrong because they're obstinately ragging for the sake of ragging is the richest of ironies.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I haven't a clue what thread to put this in, and it really doesn't belong here, but NUpolo8 ragging on people who are ragging on Tommy Armstrong because they're obstinately ragging for the sake of ragging is the richest of ironies.
How about random "jackassery"...

 
I haven't a clue what thread to put this in, and it really doesn't belong here, but NUpolo8 ragging on people who are ragging on Tommy Armstrong because they're obstinately ragging for the sake of ragging is the richest of ironies.
Well, you could make a thread called "Huskerboard can't take a week without finding something to hate about NUpolo8 so here's something idiotic" thread and put it there.
Or, you actually did the right thing by putting in this thread because your implication that I just up and decided to dislike Bo Pelini with NO particular good reason, much like the idiots are doing with Tommy is pretty goddamn ridiculous.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I haven't a clue what thread to put this in, and it really doesn't belong here, but NUpolo8 ragging on people who are ragging on Tommy Armstrong because they're obstinately ragging for the sake of ragging is the richest of ironies.
Well, you could make a thread called "Huskerboard can't take a week without finding something to hate about NUpolo8 so here's something idiotic" thread and put it there.
Or, you actually did the right thing by putting in this thread because your implication that I just up and decided to dislike Bo Pelini with NO particular good reason, much like the idiots are doing with Tommy is pretty goddamn ridiculous.
So you hating on Bo is ok, but the guys hating on Tommy, not ok??

Somebodies entitled...

 
I haven't a clue what thread to put this in, and it really doesn't belong here, but NUpolo8 ragging on people who are ragging on Tommy Armstrong because they're obstinately ragging for the sake of ragging is the richest of ironies.
Well, you could make a thread called "Huskerboard can't take a week without finding something to hate about NUpolo8 so here's something idiotic" thread and put it there.Or, you actually did the right thing by putting in this thread because your implication that I just up and decided to dislike Bo Pelini with NO particular good reason, much like the idiots are doing with Tommy is pretty goddamn ridiculous.
So you hating on Bo is ok, but the guys hating on Tommy, not ok??

Somebodies entitled...
Dude, you seriously baffle me.....
What exactly has Armstrong done do get completely housed with criticism? Lost one game?

Compare that to Bo, who has done plenty.

Never mind the fact that if Tommy is that bad, you might want to angry at the guy who recruited him started him and didn't give him all the tools to succeed.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I haven't a clue what thread to put this in, and it really doesn't belong here, but NUpolo8 ragging on people who are ragging on Tommy Armstrong because they're obstinately ragging for the sake of ragging is the richest of ironies.
Well, you could make a thread called "Huskerboard can't take a week without finding something to hate about NUpolo8 so here's something idiotic" thread and put it there.Or, you actually did the right thing by putting in this thread because your implication that I just up and decided to dislike Bo Pelini with NO particular good reason, much like the idiots are doing with Tommy is pretty goddamn ridiculous.
So you hating on Bo is ok, but the guys hating on Tommy, not ok??

Somebodies entitled...
Dude, you seriously baffle me.....
What exactly has Armstrong done do get completely housed with criticism? Lost one game?

Compare that to Bo, who has done plenty.

Never mind the fact that if Tommy is that bad, you might want to angry at the guy who recruited him started him and didn't give him all the tools to succeed.
You baffle me...

It's ok for you to complain about Bo, but nobody is allowed to complain about Tommy??

Pot, meet kettle...

 
I haven't a clue what thread to put this in, and it really doesn't belong here, but NUpolo8 ragging on people who are ragging on Tommy Armstrong because they're obstinately ragging for the sake of ragging is the richest of ironies.
Well, you could make a thread called "Huskerboard can't take a week without finding something to hate about NUpolo8 so here's something idiotic" thread and put it there.Or, you actually did the right thing by putting in this thread because your implication that I just up and decided to dislike Bo Pelini with NO particular good reason, much like the idiots are doing with Tommy is pretty goddamn ridiculous.
So you hating on Bo is ok, but the guys hating on Tommy, not ok??

Somebodies entitled...
Dude, you seriously baffle me.....What exactly has Armstrong done do get completely housed with criticism? Lost one game?

Compare that to Bo, who has done plenty.

Never mind the fact that if Tommy is that bad, you might want to angry at the guy who recruited him started him and didn't give him all the tools to succeed.
You baffle me...

It's ok for you to complain about Bo, but nobody is allowed to complain about Tommy??

Pot, meet kettle...
I'm trying to say Bo has done more to merit harsh criticism over the past seven years than Armstrong has over the last twelve months.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok Polo, with your line of reasoning, I have no right to complain about Beck and that I want him gone, but you're still completely within the right to want Bo fired...

Hopefully this makes things a bit less muddy for ya...

 
I haven't a clue what thread to put this in, and it really doesn't belong here, but NUpolo8 ragging on people who are ragging on Tommy Armstrong because they're obstinately ragging for the sake of ragging is the richest of ironies.
NUpolo8 has an entire thread dedicated to him in the shed. that would have been probably a good place to put it.

but now that it is out there. it is hilarious to see the same people who dutifully defend bo so harshly and impulsively criticize the starting qb, who bo is responsible for. even though that player is doing quite well and is bo's best hope to get past the four loss slump [along with that 18th (is that what it is still?) SOS]

because remember, it is important to hold the players accountable, demand more from them, even when they are performing quite well. but the coach, well, let us not be too hard on him for consistently getting 4 losses regardless of who has been behind center the past 6 years.

 
Back
Top