The Republican Utopia

Archy1221 said:
I certainly agree with your sentiment.   From what I understand Currently based on the the appeal, it’s lawful for them to be there and secure Federal Property.  To detain individuals IF necessary and immediately pass over to civilian law enforcement.   
 

My post about Edward and using the Reuters article as sourcing was to show Edward is a clown and didn’t understand what he is posting.   Or he understand but just wants engagement even though he knows he’s given incorrect context.   Unprecedented is different from illegal.

And before someone gets all bent out of shape, I don’t think military should be there unless Newsome called up the guard.   It’s okay to have that opinion while calling out people like Edward who are factually wrong and/or narrative posting small pieces of info leaving out the larger context. 
Click to expand...
Fair enough. I think one is more important than the other but I would agree those positions aren't mutually exclusive 

 
We all know that I am the biggest anti-gun guy around and that for the most part I am the only one that really seems to understand that guns are stupid.

But, this is clearly a guy that is getting attacked first.

Here is what SHOULD happen.

The weirdo screaming in his face.  Jail time

The weirdo that hit him.  Jail time

The weirdo with the gun.  Jail time.  

Somehow, all of us that post here have been able to go our entire lives without screaming in someones face, without punching a stranger and without carrying and then pulling out our gun.

Which means those dorks can also manage to not do those things.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
teachercd said:
We all know that I am the biggest anti-gun guy around and that for the most part I am the only one that really seems to understand that guns are stupid.

But, this is clearly a guy that is getting attacked first.

Here is what SHOULD happen.

The weirdo screaming in his face.  Jail time

The weirdo that hit him.  Jail time

The weirdo with the gun.  Jail time.  

Somehow, all of us that post here have been able to go our entire lives without screaming in someones face, without punching a stranger and without carrying and then pulling out our gun.

Which means those dorks can also manage to not do those things.
Click to expand...
Maybe I’m the only one thinking this, but the word staged comes to mind when I watch that video.   
no one tries to take his hood off when “attacking” him

no one really lands any punches when he is “attacked”

then dude pulls out a gun and we have like three people walking towards the dude with a gun and walking as if they don’t have a care in the world.   
No posts with law enforcement eventually catching the dude with a gun posted here?

Strange.   But if it’s not staged, the people who “attacked” him should get assault charges and if the gun dude is breaking the law by brandishing a gun he should get charged.  

 
Archy1221 said:
Maybe I’m the only one thinking this, but the word staged comes to mind when I watch that video.   
no one tries to take his hood off when “attacking” him

no one really lands any punches when he is “attacked”

then dude pulls out a gun and we have like three people walking towards the dude with a gun and walking as if they don’t have a care in the world.   
No posts with law enforcement eventually catching the dude with a gun posted here?

Strange.   But if it’s not staged, the people who “attacked” him should get assault charges and if the gun dude is breaking the law by brandishing a gun he should get charged.  
Click to expand...
Okay, I also thought it was weird how some of the people were just standing there and a few were even walking towards him when he pulled out the gun.

Maybe I am just a giant huge sissy but I would have beat Carl Lewis in a race when that gun came out.

 
Back
Top