To answer the age old question.

[Brouhaha]

WE WON!

http://www.whatifsports.com/ncaafb/boxscore.asp?GameID=3789516&nomenu=1

 

[beanman]

WE WON!

http://www.whatifspo...789516&nomenu=1

No way we would have given up 271 passing yards against Greaseball and that no talent receiving corps of theirs.

 

[The Dude]

I wasn't aware it was an age old question. Of course Nebraska was the best team that year.

 

[Foppa]

 

[Brouhaha]

:sarcasm

I thought this wasn't needed. Our 1997 defense as beanman pointed out, would never let up those kind of numbers. We were far superior.

 

[deedsker]

 

[Mavric]

I was expecting the chicken or the egg.

About that game, we would definitely have won. And there's no way they hold us scoreless in the second half.

 

[Hoosker]

Welp, there ya go...

 

[JTrain]

Nebraska would win by 2-3 scores. '94 vs. Penn St. would've been a much better game.

 

[beanman]

Nebraska would win by 2-3 scores. '94 vs. Penn St. would've been a much better game.

Exactly. That one would have actually been tough. 97 Michigan was way overrated.

 

[Brouhaha]

I thought the sarcasm was pretty strong. My fault on that guys.

 

[Eric the Red]

Nebraska would win by 2-3 scores. '94 vs. Penn St. would've been a much better game.

I think this is pretty realistic...Mich defense was stout.

 

[Eric the Red]

The vegas line had it Nebraska giving 7

 

[The Dude]

I was expecting the chicken or the egg.

"Just to settle it once and for all: Which came first the Chicken or the Egg? The Egg -- laid by a bird that was not a Chicken."

-Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson