ZRod
Active member
At least 46 would be exciting. I wouldn't have to check and see if I'm still alive every commercial break.Well would you guys rather score 14 points and lose or score 46 and lose?
Last edited by a moderator:
At least 46 would be exciting. I wouldn't have to check and see if I'm still alive every commercial break.Well would you guys rather score 14 points and lose or score 46 and lose?
Then we’d complain about a horrible defense….At least 46 would be exciting. I wouldn't have to check and see if I'm still alive every commercial break.
We tried that with Callahan, and he was run out of town on rails.Well would you guys rather score 14 points and lose or score 46 and lose?
Nebraska gets a lot of crap about Burrow. But it was really Ohio State that messed up. They chose JT Barrett over him. Barrett had a good but not great college career, went undrafted and never did anything in the NFL.Same with Burrow, a career backup at OSU, hit the portal and was an average QB in year one at LSU. Then in year 2 QBs one of the greatest offenses in CFB history and becomes the #1 overall draft pick.
Low scoring games can be exciting. Just depends if it's because of two bad offenses or two good defensesAt least 46 would be exciting. I wouldn't have to check and see if I'm still alive every commercial break.
Oh sure. We're more of the former than the later though.Low scoring games can be exciting. Just depends if it's because of two bad offenses or two good defenses
Burrow lost the Ohio State QB battle in Spring 2018 to Dwayne Haskins. Haskins then had a great year in 2018, and was drafted in the first round of the 2019 draft. But, yes, Ohio State had the first “bad evaluation” of Joe Burrow. Basically,Nebraska gets a lot of crap about Burrow. But it was really Ohio State that messed up. They chose JT Barrett over him. Barrett had a good but not great college career, went undrafted and never did anything in the NFL.
They had Burrow in practice every day. So either they were worse evaluators that we are or some guys are just late bloomers that need the right situation to thrive. Even Burrow's first year at LSU wasn't anything spectacular.
I think a lot of it is supporting cast, but also the ability of coaches to put kids in good situations to succeed. I wonder sometimes how many guys could have been super stars in a different setting, but did nothing because they were in the wrong one. We will never know. I do know that we consistently have been unable to get players to "level up" so to speak, but hopefully that tide is turning.I'm getting the sense that portal QBs tend to be a crapshoot and not exactly a science. Nothing from Michael Penix Jr at Indiana would lead you to believe that he would be at this level at UW. He got worse each year at IU, but finds the right fit at UW and goes off.
Same with Burrow, a career backup at OSU, hit the portal and was an average QB in year one at LSU. Then in year 2 QBs one of the greatest offenses in CFB history and becomes the #1 overall draft pick.
Michael Penix Jr
2019 Indiana 6 games / 69% comp% / 8.7 ypa / 2.5% Int% / 81.6 QBR (would have been 10th nationally if qualified)
2020 Indiana 6 games / 56% comp% / 7.5 ypa / 1.8% Int% / 67.7 QBR (43rd nationally)
2021 Indiana 5 games / 54% comp% / 5.8 ypa / 4.3% Int% / 51.1 QBR (would have been 87th nationally if qualified)
2022 Washington 13 games / 65% comp% / 8.4 ypa / 1.4% Int% / 81.1 QBR (12th nationally)
2023 Washington 6 games / 72% comp% / 10.7 ypa / 1.4% Int% / 91.7 QBR (2nd nationally)
I'm getting the sense that portal QBs tend to be a crapshoot and not exactly a science. Nothing from Michael Penix Jr at Indiana would lead you to believe that he would be at this level at UW. He got worse each year at IU, but finds the right fit at UW and goes off.
Same with Burrow, a career backup at OSU, hit the portal and was an average QB in year one at LSU. Then in year 2 QBs one of the greatest offenses in CFB history and becomes the #1 overall draft pick.
Michael Penix Jr
2019 Indiana 6 games / 69% comp% / 8.7 ypa / 2.5% Int% / 81.6 QBR (would have been 10th nationally if qualified)
2020 Indiana 6 games / 56% comp% / 7.5 ypa / 1.8% Int% / 67.7 QBR (43rd nationally)
2021 Indiana 5 games / 54% comp% / 5.8 ypa / 4.3% Int% / 51.1 QBR (would have been 87th nationally if qualified)
2022 Washington 13 games / 65% comp% / 8.4 ypa / 1.4% Int% / 81.1 QBR (12th nationally)
2023 Washington 6 games / 72% comp% / 10.7 ypa / 1.4% Int% / 91.7 QBR (2nd nationally)
Signed: The last 10 years.Fix the o line things start really looking good
We have a deep play option now in the passing game. Fix the o line things start really looking good
Well that’s not happening this year. HH will need an off-season to fix that arm angle he is throwing at. I can only imagine he will only improve.And find a QB with some semblance of accuracy...
That arm angle isn’t getting fixed. He will not be the long-term answer at QB.Well that’s not happening this year. HH will need an off-season to fix that arm angle he is throwing at. I can only imagine he will only improve.