Lorewarn
New member
Sorry, it's season total fumble leaders in the NCAA lol. Really fumbled the bit not including that relevant context
https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/player-stat/fumbles
Triaging the QB room
- Thread starter Scarlet
- Start date
Sorry, it's season total fumble leaders in the NCAA lol. Really fumbled the bit not including that relevant context
https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/player-stat/fumbles
ZRod
Active member
Purdy has 107 pass attempts in his career. HH has 152. More or less a 2 game difference. The sample size is close enough. HH has a 7:6 TD/INT, Purdy is 1:1.
The comparison is fine and fair.
Last edited by a moderator:
suh_fan93
New member
Even a 1 game difference can make all the difference. Again small sample size. It probably doesn't matter anyway who's playing back there this year. I still don't see the harm in seeing what or how he might respond if HH or Sims are still fumbling and bumbling.
Also thanks for the 'Warning' Mavric!!!
LUUUUULZ
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you. I didn’t put 2 and 2 together based on the few posts before yours about fumbles.
I thought the source was trying to assign HH a higher “value” to a team than the others listed which would have been crazy in some of those cases like Ward.
Husker in WI
New member
I don't know if you can treat Purdy's experience equally when it was under a totally different staff asking him to do different things. Personally, I'd like to see him get a shot for at least a series or two - I think Rhule said something along the lines of "he throws the ball the best" in the fall. Our offense has just been so deficient in the passing game that I think even if Purdy is worse than Haarberg overall, if he is a step up in the passing game I would buy that the offense could be better. I'd trade some of our run game for more of a pass game.
That being said, I'm sure the coaches have considered that and don't feel Purdy's edge in the passing game outweighs Haarberg's in the run game. I'd still like to see, but rotating QBs is tough.
That being said, I'm sure the coaches have considered that and don't feel Purdy's edge in the passing game outweighs Haarberg's in the run game. I'd still like to see, but rotating QBs is tough.
ZRod
Active member
Well, Chubba has played in 4 more games... Pretty sure the numbers tells us enough to make an educated decision.
HH is better than Sims, and if HH and Chunba are pretty even then any sane coach sticks with HH unless he goes off the rails. He's commanded this team to a 5-2 record in 7 starts; with a patch work O line, backfield, and WR corps.
Last edited by a moderator:
ColoradoHusk
Donor
Why throw in a QB who isn’t getting many reps in practice? If a move to another QB is going to happen, it will need to start in practice, and that hasn’t happened.
Ulty
New member
We've got some top-notch message board engagement here, guys.
gobiggergoredder
Active member
I wanted to see Sims. He was 2nd string. Those 3 plays were.....interesting. I don't need to see anything behind him. I'm good. Ride or die with Harby.
What we should all be hoping for is we have boots on the ground trying to steal 1-2 QBs in the portal for 2024.
Lunchbucket
New member
Disregard
Last edited by a moderator:
Enhance
Administrator
Last edited by a moderator:
MyBloodIsRed16
Active member
It's a challenge for all of these QBs to complete a 5 yard pass