I tend to align philosophically with
@Lorewarn in that the foundation should be built upon maximizing the development and process with existing talent, which ideally translates into wins, which helps improve the program's profile, which translates into better recruits, which raises the floor of the process, which translates to more wins, etc. That endless feedback loop.
I don't think the talent Nebraska has brought in during the last 8-10 years is as poor as some of the final end of season results have indicated, so there's been a lot of wasted potential.
And I don't necessarily want to make one recruit into some kind of grand indictment of this challenge, but I do think Raiola is a bit of a microcosm of it. He's the kind of kid you throw the kitchen sink at, and yet, he committed elsewhere. Nebraska is in a better position than most to compete financially, but then you'd have to ask why he'd want to attend a university that has failed to reach .500 much of the last decade.
It all matters and it's all relevant, of course. It'd just be really nice to know we're maximizing potential of what we have to then say "yeah, we know the process works, but now we just need some players with a higher ceiling to go to the next level."