4skers89
New member
Sorry I already gave @cheekygeek a +1 since I knew he wouldn't be rewarded for his attempt at rep point collecting.New guy here.
Sorry I already gave @cheekygeek a +1 since I knew he wouldn't be rewarded for his attempt at rep point collecting.New guy here.
Seems to be a lot of codependency problems with people who A) worry about themI’ve been on this board for around 10 years, haven’t seen ONE thing about a “rep point” changing my life. Who “collects” these? And more importantly, why?!?!?
please +1 this post if you agree! :sarcasm
I would +1, but would hate to add to your wrinklesSeems to be a lot of codependency problems with people who A) worry about them
and
B) more serious personality issues for those who worry that OTHERS are concerned with getting them.
In my mind they are like wrinkles... stick around long enough and you’ll acquire them (without even trying).
Wait a doggone minute... Bill Callahan and Bo Pelini are not Scott Frost. Bill took over a good team and destroyed the program. Bo took over a terrible team and made them decent (top 40). The guy who shall not be named took over a decent program and made them bake cupcakes. Scott took over a bakery, had 30+ dough boys leave in his first year for other culinary schools, and has so far turned that bakery back into a smelter. The blacksmiths can’t replace doughnuts with iron overnight. This staff had the hardest job of all 4 coaching staffs partially named above. He’s going to need time to win a division/conference championship. What we’re seeing is an actual transformation of a team. Culture changes take time. These kids can win, they just need to believe it. A lot will change by the OSU game, including the tone of this thread.oh also, I remember a lot of people were saying the same sorts of justifications of, "oh we were being vanilla saving it for our big opponent) in 2013 against Wyoming/Southern Miss, claiming (with some even offering insider source accounts) that we were saving the good stuff for UCLA, and also in 2007 against nevada/wake forest before our big matchup against USC
Wait a doggone minute... Bill Callahan and Bo Pelini are not Scott Frost. Bill took over a good team and destroyed the program. Bo took over a terrible team and made them decent (top 40). The guy who shall not be named took over a decent program and made them bake cupcakes. Scott took over a bakery, had 30+ dough boys leave in his first year for other culinary schools, and has so far turned that bakery back into a smelter. The blacksmiths can’t replace doughnuts with iron overnight. This staff had the hardest job of all 4 coaching staffs partially named above. He’s going to need time to win a division/conference championship. What we’re seeing is an actual transformation of a team. Culture changes take time. These kids can win, they just need to believe it. A lot will change by the OSU game, including the tone of this thread.
In 2008, Nick Saban’s 2nd year at Alabama, the Tide came out flat in their second game against Tulane. Alabama won 20-6. Tulane finished 2-10 that year. Alabama has 18 returning starters. They finished 12-2. We aren’t going to finish with 12 wins, but I guarantee we’ll win at least 9 this year and have a chance to win the division. Frost took over a much worse team than Nick. We’ll look back on the first 3 years under Frost as clear building blocks to rebuilding a perineal power house.
Hahahahaha! Good catch. :lol: Perennial*Yup. Scott Frost will be behind the ballsiest team for years to come.
Would they have executed better going deeper into the playbook? I don’t think so. Having a broader scope of plays was not the issue.Coming off a 4 win season with an 0-6 start, Nebraska is in no position to sandbag anyone.
The Colorado game will count precisely as much as the USA game, and Colorado isn't exactly a P5 juggernaut you can only defeat with deception.
I think Frost devised a gameplan featuring plays that could and should have beaten South Alabama, and we saw them in a successful and hardly boring first drive and touchdown.
Then the offense stalled -- or didn't even see the ball for long stretches -- while the defense staked them a lead.
If Frost had gone deep in his playbook against a South Alabama team we were leading by 2 or 3 touchdowns, people here would have wondered why we couldn't impose our will with our bread and butter plays ---- which under Frost are actually pretty exciting when well executed.
This wasn't about Colorado.
Coming off a 4 win season with an 0-6 start, Nebraska is in no position to sandbag anyone.
The Colorado game will count precisely as much as the USA game, and Colorado isn't exactly a P5 juggernaut you can only defeat with deception.
I think Frost devised a gameplan featuring plays that could and should have beaten South Alabama, and we saw them in a successful and hardly boring first drive and touchdown.
Then the offense stalled -- or didn't even see the ball for long stretches -- while the defense staked them a lead.
If Frost had gone deep in his playbook against a South Alabama team we were leading by 2 or 3 touchdowns, people here would have wondered why we couldn't impose our will with our bread and butter plays ---- which under Frost are actually pretty exciting when well executed.
This wasn't about Colorado.
Would they have executed better going deeper into the playbook? I don’t think so. Having a broader scope of plays was not the issue.
Barely could execute a snap, so...Really? Absolutely different formations and different plays should’ve allowed us to exploit them stacking the box and our propensity of attempting exactly what their defense was designed to stop. Unless of course you assume we would not have been able to execute anything.