Osborne had some of those peaks and valleys to be sure. He kinda struck out with at least three quarterbacks, Mike Grant, Mickey Joseph and Keithen McCant. None of those three quarterbacks really panned out at NU. Considering we had Turner Gill and Steve Taylor before those three and Tommie Frazier and Scott Frost after, that was a pretty serious valley.That's true of pretty much every offense. Even TO needed a top-notch QB to win the big games.My problem with Riley's offense is that I think it's going to prove to be inconsistent. Lots of peaks and valleys depending on QB play. I personally believe it's why he is a career .500 coach. Not saying he isn't a great X and O guy because I think he is.
For all the talk about offensive style, playing good to great defense matters a great deal more, especially if we're talking about consistency.
Osborne did not have valleys, at least not in the sense the word is commonly used.
That - not the championships - is the most incredible aspect of his tenure.
You're proving BRV's point, which was that the beauty of Osborne's system is that it wasn't so heavily dependent on elite QB play. We had three QBs who were not "amazing" by NU fan standards.*** Yet, NU won a 3 of 5 conference championships between Steve Taylor leaving and Frazier emerging as a freshman. NU also went 39-9-1 those years.
In no world or era of CFB would that be considered a "valley" by an objective observer.
***Note, this is often absurd standard, considering that, for example, McCant was first team all-conference and offensive player of the year as a senior.
Last edited by a moderator: