Interesting since leadership in the Republican party condemns Liz but says nothing about Greene. Pretty easy to see who they support. Watch and see how her and Gaetz' love Trump tour goes and you will see who the stars are of the party. Meanwhile, LIz is condemned and might not win reelection.Because MTG is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things and Liz is in party leadership at the moment. I understand why people keep trying to make MTG a thing, but it just makes them look further clownish.
Liz won’t win re-election which is why she is floating a Pres bid that she won’t go through with. Just trying to create a bigger post political platform for herself
She won’t win re-election.Interesting since leadership in the Republican party condemns Liz but says nothing about Greene. Pretty easy to see who they support. Watch and see how her and Gaetz' love Trump tour goes and you will see who the stars are of the party. Meanwhile, LIz is condemned and might not win reelection.
She isn't because of the pushback from Democrats in congress. But....again....where's the condemnation when they are more than willing to do it to someone like Liz who is a true conservative but has the audacity to criticize Trump.She won’t win re-election.
Watch and see how MTG does not progress up the Republican food chain. Maybe then you will understand.
If Republican VOTERS could choose the leadership of the party, do you think they would choose MTG to represent them?She won’t win re-election.
Watch and see how MTG does not progress up the Republican food chain. Maybe then you will understand.
Exactly. I've never said she was leadership in the party. But, people like her, Boebert, Hawley and Trump are not criticized while people like Amash, Liz, Romney and McCain are demonized and ushered out.If Republican VOTERS could choose the leadership of the party, do you think they would choose MTG to represent them?
My guess is they would absolutely vote for her. Republican voters love her and what she stands for. That is what he most likely means when he says future of the party. More people like her will be voted into office, and less people like Liz Cheney or Mitt Romney. It does not matter one iota who politicians think are the future and who they choose as leadership. Its the voters that decide and they have spoken with their donations going toward people like MTG and Lauren Brobert.
Again, I am more and more convinced that their was a philosophical flip of the parties starting slowly in the later 1970s but picking up steam in the 1990s and climaxing with Trump - We got the old Jim Crow southern Democratic party now cloaked as the GOP and the Dem Party, once known as a racist party, now being the champion of race.It's pretty clear what direction the voters are taking the party and what they want to see.
Absolutely not. Her never having a chance at National office will eventually be proof of me being correctIf Republican VOTERS could choose the leadership of the party, do you think they would choose MTG to represent them?
Well I can’t wait to see her run for Senate or President then and easily win the nomination. (Hint) she won’t and only idiots think she ever could have a chance.Exactly. I've never said she was leadership in the party. But, people like her, Boebert, Hawley and Trump are not criticized while people like Amash, Liz, Romney and McCain are demonized and ushered out.
It's pretty clear what direction the voters are taking the party and what they want to see.
Im not quite sure what is so hard to comprehend what BRB is saying. Lets put it another way, MTG ideology is the future of the party. There is that better?Absolutely not. Her never having a chance at National office will eventually be proof of me being correct
No. It won't.Absolutely not. Her never having a chance at National office will eventually be proof of me being correct