I think you mean Army, as they played Wisconsin this season, and I don't know if they "nearly beat Wisconsin". Army never led, and was down by 2 TD's for the majority of the 2nd half. That amazing Army offense racked up 266 total yards and 14 total points.Also, Navy nearly beat Wisconsin this season with a triple option and look at their recruits (mostly 0 stars). When was the last time we were that close to beating them?
A few other issues with running that style of offense today is because high schools are no longer running it. So you don't have kids running that system in high school so you would be teaching kids new stuff they have never heard before. It would be harder to find kids that fit your system because you would be guessing they would be good at those roles. The same could be said for filling out a full coaching staff of guys with the right experience and expertise to teach the kids. That knowledge and expertise is going to die with the likes of the Osborne's of the world. But again many fans and national pundits claim the Huskers in the 90's were an option team but they were not. It was part of their arsenal but not all they did.I think you mean Army, as they played Wisconsin this season, and I don't know if they "nearly beat Wisconsin". Army never led, and was down by 2 TD's for the majority of the 2nd half. That amazing Army offense racked up 266 total yards and 14 total points.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/boxscore/_/gameId/401282826
lol, sorry, army.I think you mean Army, as they played Wisconsin this season, and I don't know if they "nearly beat Wisconsin". Army never led, and was down by 2 TD's for the majority of the 2nd half. That amazing Army offense racked up 266 total yards and 14 total points.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/boxscore/_/gameId/401282826
Well, for someone who acts like a big expert on these option offenses, I would expect you to know which military academy played Wisconsin earlier this year.lol, sorry, army.
But again many fans and national pundits claim the Huskers in the 90's were an option team but they were not. It was part of their arsenal but not all they did.
Don't we run option offense currently?Then let's run whatever you want to call it. We can run a base option offense and call it something else because there's other plays in the playbook too.
So in 95 and 97 we only ran option 19% and 16% of the time. I wouldnt call option the base. It wasnt even 20% of what we did.Then let's run whatever you want to call it. We can run a base option offense and call it something else because there's other plays in the playbook too.
So in 95 and 97 we only ran option 19% and 16% of the time. I wouldnt call option the base. It wasnt even 20% of what we did.
We counting zone reads and RPOs?
I think you mean Army, as they played Wisconsin this season, and I don't know if they "nearly beat Wisconsin". Army never led, and was down by 2 TD's for the majority of the 2nd half. That amazing Army offense racked up 266 total yards and 14 total points.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/boxscore/_/gameId/401282826