desertshox
New member
the week before that they ran for 248 and passed for 503.The week before they were held to negative 48 yards rushing on 29 carries.That defense held Michigan to negative 21 rushing yards, and under 200 offensive yards for the game. I personally would consider that a dominating defensive performanceGlad you enjoyed your day there Fowler. But do you know how exaggerated this sounds? Dominated??? While TRAILING, a freshman QB pitched a game winning TD to Abdullah inside the 10 with two minutes left in the game is what you got out of that? In front of 112K people. Seasoned group. Domination. Wow................Great read that summarizes my thoughts on the current state of the program. Apparently this is written by a booster. Enjoy.
Somehow this staff took the youngest defense in the BIG and made it not just better but significantly so. The Husker D was 107th in total defense after the South Dakota State game and it finished the season 37th. I was at the Michigan game where that defense grew up, dominated the home team in front of 112,000 people, and played with the confidence of a seasoned group. (As an aside, it comes as no surprise to me, that the Husker defense played their best games away from the drama of Lincoln. Think at Michigan and Penn State.)
http://shonhopwood.c...ed-tom-osborne/
the week after, they ran for 139 and passed for 226.
what point were you trying to make by pointing out their rushing performance against a top 5 defense?