Dr. Strangelove
New member
I get that, but it's all relative to the competition. Sure it's easier to recruit, but Auburn has to pull in monumental recruiting classes just to be 4th in their own division, on top of having annual games against Georgia.I don't think there is such thing as boosters and an athletic department getting out of the way in Power 5 FBS football, particularly at Nebraska. It's a fish bowl. You wouldn't believe how meddlesome some of our boosters have become over the last two decades, particularly when a coach wasn't getting it done.
Regardless, Auburn is objectively the better job, particularly because of the 500 mile radius recruiting advantages. That doesn't necessarily mean a coach wouldn't choose Nebraska over Auburn for certain reasons, but on paper, Auburn is absolutely the better gig.
And while I agree that Boosters are something every coach puts up with, it gets taken to entirely new levels when Boosters make up infidelity rumors to the point where the Athletic Department launches an investigation where they WANT to find evidence of wrong doing in order to fire the coach for cause.
I agree that Auburn has advantages but I don't think coaches are going to automatically think Auburn is a significantly better job than Nebraska. It's close.