Red_Payne
New member
This is the exact argument that I made...I want someone who believes, as I and many Nebraska fans do, that teams are built from the inside out. Look at the old Husker teams. Look atmodern Wisconsin. Conversely in the NFL, look at last year's Vikings or this year's Bengals (who have a statistically top 10ish QB last year, three capable RBs, AJ Green and Tyler Eifert.... and have yet to score a TD through two weeks because of their porous line). I know everyone has been excited for our recruiting recently (Parsons, Bookie, Lindsey, and the KJJ train were worth getting excited for), but the glaring issue is we haven't been recruiting offensive line we'll at all recently. Think this o-line is bad? Wait until the current class and last year's are juniors and seniors. Yikes. As good as those vets were/are, I've even been down about recruiting because of this.
I don't care who we bring in personality wise. If it must be The Bret, then it is what it is.
Then there there is another part of me that just realllllly want Scott Frost to get the job next year. This is because, obviously he more than any other options understands what made us good back in the day, what we are currently going through right now, and presumably what needs to be done to right the ship.
Raiders finally invested in their O-line, then put Carr behind them; then POOF, a decade of horrid football almost instantaneously becomes a premier offense in the NFL.
Dak Prescott was a rookie MVP candidate. I wonder if that happens without the best O-line in the NFL.
USC and Wash. both invested significantly in recruiting O-line the past couple years; and now they are powerhouses. (USC should always be a powerhouse, but they are coming off of those sanctions/scholy limits). Stanford and Wisc. have seemed to remain relevant, despite being at a recruiting disadvantage (Wisc. being location, Stan. being academic req.) because they know what they want on the O-line, and they know how to develop/build it.