Why I Would Keep Frost For 2022

FrantzHardySwag said:
Nature of the business now days. Jimbo got a 10 year, Schiano got a 8 year, Drinkwitz got 6 years, Klieman got extended out 6 years, Brohm extended out 7 years, Saban extended out 8 years, Gundy signed an extensions where he will never be under 5 years. You do it to show support and allow coaches to sell the program appropriately. Sense of urgency doesn't need to be disclosed in this line of work. 
Click to expand...
Good answer.  Stated better than what I could have said.  

 
FrantzHardySwag said:
Nature of the business now days. Jimbo got a 10 year, Schiano got a 8 year, Drinkwitz got 6 years, Klieman got extended out 6 years, Brohm extended out 7 years, Saban extended out 8 years, Gundy signed an extensions where he will never be under 5 years. You do it to show support and allow coaches to sell the program appropriately. Sense of urgency doesn't need to be disclosed in this line of work. 
Click to expand...
These numbers are crazy.  I guess I haven’t been keeping up with all this.   Big money being spent, for sure.   

 
Decoy73 said:
I think the 7 year for HCSF was to show him we were giving him more time than the norm to rebuild.   There’s a good case to be made that 2020 shouldn’t “count “ as far as expectations go.  Remember we didn’t get a spring session.  So one could argue we fired him ( if it happens) after 3 “normal “ years.  
Click to expand...
At any program that strives for division and conf titles 3 straight losing seasons is met with them no longer being employed. The fact Frost has been given a 4th season is a testament to a runway not provided at other blue blood programs. So yes the 7 year contract could have been a sign that he would be given more time than most, but year 4 IS that extra time given. 

 
If you zoom all the way out, it's hilariously appropriate for this program how much the fan base despises Frost right now while believing exactly 4 years ago that he'd be the savior.

Amazing.

 
The thing is that I really love Frost's offensive playbook. His scheme and designs are perfect for college football and perfect for the B1G.

But he has just flat out jumped the shark at actually putting together game plans and then getting grounded offensively in the first half of games.

I disagree with the people that say our offense "lacks identity." If I could make a find & replace filter work for that phrase on this site to replace 'an identity' with 'Charlize Theron in spandex' it would really enhance the experience here.

 
Undone said:
The thing is that I really love Frost's offensive playbook. His scheme and designs are perfect for college football and perfect for the B1G.

But he has just flat out jumped the shark at actually putting together game plans and then getting grounded offensively in the first half of games.

I disagree with the people that say our offense "lacks identity." If I could make a find & replace filter work for that phrase on this site to replace 'an identity' with 'Charlize Theron in spandex' it would really enhance the experience here.
Click to expand...


I think a lot of people use "lacks identity" to mean "we ain't scorin' enuff points!" 

 
GSG said:
I think a lot of people use "lacks identity" to mean "we ain't scorin' enuff points!" 
Click to expand...


Yeah, either that or "we should run the triple option 75% of the time like it's 1995."

But I still believe firmly that our offense lacks Charlize Theron in spandex.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Undone said:
Yeah, either that or "we should run the triple option 75% of the time like it's 1995."

But I still believe firmly that our offense lacks Charlize Theron in spandex.
Click to expand...


Its really not either of your suggestions. It's taking what the defense gives you vs imposing your will. 

The ones that say we don't have an identity would prefer we were strong and talented enough to impose our will, like we did in the old days, creating our opportunities rather than being opportunistic.

 
Undone said:
Yeah, either that or "we should run the triple option 75% of the time like it's 1995."

But I still believe firmly that our offense lacks Charlize Theron in spandex.
Click to expand...
giphy.gif


 
Decoy73 said:
Not what I said.  But a 7 year deal (vs the standard 5) gives the impression of getting longer to “rebuild.”  So my point why did we even do it?   If we’re firing after 4 based on W/L, then a 5 year deal would have been better.   IMO a shorter initial contact provides for a better sense of urgency.  
Click to expand...
If Frost is the coach we hope he is. He shouldn’t need motivation from how long his contract is. Do you think Saban does a better job if his contract is longer? I doubt it. He is self motivated by the desire to be great. I think we gave him 7 cause we thought we were hiring the next Saban. 

 
Huskers93-97 said:
If Frost is the coach we hope he is. He shouldn’t need motivation from how long his contract is. Do you think Saban does a better job if his contract is longer? I doubt it. He is self motivated by the desire to be great. I think we gave him 7 cause we thought we were hiring the next Saban. 
Click to expand...


Nope. Cuz we know what a dumpster fire Rileyaco left. At the time everyone agreed.

 
Born N Bled Red said:
Nope. Cuz we know what a dumpster fire Rileyaco left. At the time everyone agreed.
Click to expand...
I get that, but your missing the point that we should be in a much better place after 4 years. 3-9 most likely in year 4 is not showing any signs of heading in the right direction. 6-6 he is back next year. I think we can agree 6-6 is very low standards and a long leash. Frost is the one not doing his part to show he deserves 7 years. You seem intent on being frustrated with the program like it may not honor 7 years. But Frost is not holding up his end. Hell if he gets to 5-7 this year he might be back. Talk about a long leash. You think any other school would keep him? I’m not talking blue bloods. f#&%ing Kansas would fire him 

 
Back
Top