Last edited by a moderator:
Some kids cannot improve enough to be effective. You see it in MLB all the time. There is no shortage of guys that throw in the high 90s that cannot consistently hit their spots. Watch Verlander. He is nearly unhittable when he has control. When he starts walking people his ERA jumps over 5.Really? You coached baseball for 15 years and never improved a pitchers accuracy? Were you the pitching coach? Or is this like 7-8 Coach Pitch?That is my point about accuracy. I coached baseball for 15 years, and I have found many kids with great velocity that can't be pitchers because of accuracy. I don't think it is possible for TA to improve his accuracy. It seems like he should be able to improve his decision making, but he has worked with two coaching staffs, and make just as many ridiculous throws as ever, and he still can't check down and find the wide open receiver. I say put him at LB.See that's the thing, I'm not asking about some Joe Blow who is entirely devoid of the physical tools to play in the NFL. Like you. Or me. I'm asking about Tommy. He's clearly athletic enough. And he has a strong enough arm. He just lacks accuracy. That, and he's prone to force throws that sometimes end up in picks.I could play in the NFL if I improved my arm strength, grew 6 inches and could read NFL defenses.
TA will never play QB in the NFL. He may have a shot if he changes positions. He is fast and tough. But there is no way he can read NFL defenses and make good decisions consistently. He also struggles with high percentages passes.
So, back to my question: If Tommy could gain some accuracy--say, Ganzesque accuracy--and throw fewer picks, would he play Sundays?
Lol. You sort of avoided my question. The difference is any improvement made by Tommy as a passer increases his chances of being a better QB by a great margin. Imagine if teams had to respect the short passing game, how many deep balls Tommy would be able to hit over the top?Some kids cannot improve enough to be effective. You see it in MLB all the time. There is no shortage of guys that throw in the high 90s that cannot consistently hit their spots. Watch Verlander. He is nearly unhittable when he has control. When he starts walking people his ERA jumps over 5.Really? You coached baseball for 15 years and never improved a pitchers accuracy? Were you the pitching coach? Or is this like 7-8 Coach Pitch?That is my point about accuracy. I coached baseball for 15 years, and I have found many kids with great velocity that can't be pitchers because of accuracy. I don't think it is possible for TA to improve his accuracy. It seems like he should be able to improve his decision making, but he has worked with two coaching staffs, and make just as many ridiculous throws as ever, and he still can't check down and find the wide open receiver. I say put him at LB.See that's the thing, I'm not asking about some Joe Blow who is entirely devoid of the physical tools to play in the NFL. Like you. Or me. I'm asking about Tommy. He's clearly athletic enough. And he has a strong enough arm. He just lacks accuracy. That, and he's prone to force throws that sometimes end up in picks.I could play in the NFL if I improved my arm strength, grew 6 inches and could read NFL defenses.
TA will never play QB in the NFL. He may have a shot if he changes positions. He is fast and tough. But there is no way he can read NFL defenses and make good decisions consistently. He also struggles with high percentages passes.
So, back to my question: If Tommy could gain some accuracy--say, Ganzesque accuracy--and throw fewer picks, would he play Sundays?
That's true. If you remember before Magic's final season, Bo stated that Martinez would play QB in the NFL as a fact at B10 Media Days.That's saying a lot Matt given we had Tmart here who was a 60% Career passer and less picks than Tommy over a longer span and he didn't make it (granted he just didn't clear medically but would a been a WR anyways).
Armstrong next year would have to have 1,750 rushing yards and 42 rushing TDs to equal what Tebow did running wise.Tommy is a better runner than Ganz. Heck, Tommy is a better runner than Tim Tebow. And Tommy has more arm strength than Ganz. He just doesn't have Ganz' accuracy, and knack for avoiding interceptions. That's why I picked Ganz. (I thought about using Vince Ferragamo--but Ganz is more recent.)Ganz didn't make it in the NFL, so why are you using him as a measuring stick? He threw his fair share of picks too.... he becomes as accurate as Joe Ganz, and has as low of an interception percentage? (Ganz: 65% completion. 18 picks out of 585 passes)
===================
Or maybe I should rephrase the question: What existing (or past) NFL quarterback would Tommy compare to if he becomes as accurate and throws as few picks as Ganz?
I think Tommy is an inch or two short from being a sure-fire pick. I think somebody would gamble on him with his current numbers if he was closer to 6"3'.See that's the thing, I'm not asking about some Joe Blow who is entirely devoid of the physical tools to play in the NFL. Like you. Or me. I'm asking about Tommy. He's clearly athletic enough. And he has a strong enough arm. He just lacks accuracy. That, and he's prone to force throws that sometimes end up in picks.I could play in the NFL if I improved my arm strength, grew 6 inches and could read NFL defenses.
TA will never play QB in the NFL. He may have a shot if he changes positions. He is fast and tough. But there is no way he can read NFL defenses and make good decisions consistently. He also struggles with high percentages passes.
So, back to my question: If Tommy could gain some accuracy--say, Ganzesque accuracy--and throw fewer picks, would he play Sundays?
Right, because Tebow and Tommy ran extremely similar offenses throughout their career. LolArmstrong next year would have to have 1,750 rushing yards and 42 rushing TDs to equal what Tebow did running wise.Tommy is a better runner than Ganz. Heck, Tommy is a better runner than Tim Tebow. And Tommy has more arm strength than Ganz. He just doesn't have Ganz' accuracy, and knack for avoiding interceptions. That's why I picked Ganz. (I thought about using Vince Ferragamo--but Ganz is more recent.)Ganz didn't make it in the NFL, so why are you using him as a measuring stick? He threw his fair share of picks too.... he becomes as accurate as Joe Ganz, and has as low of an interception percentage? (Ganz: 65% completion. 18 picks out of 585 passes)
===================
Or maybe I should rephrase the question: What existing (or past) NFL quarterback would Tommy compare to if he becomes as accurate and throws as few picks as Ganz?