I hear ya. I'm happy with whoever our staff gets. They have their reasons for going after the guys that they want. I'll take whoever they get and more importantly I want guys who WANT to be Huskers. Which is why Jamal Turner is such an impressive kid because he seems to REALLY WANT to be a Husker. Give me 20 Jamal Turner's not because of his rankings, but because of his attitude.Whatever is right, not something I should wrap my head around....give me a migraine.Put it this way, they're all equally fallacious in their methods. But as fans we'll love whichever service gives our guys the highest stars/rankings. Case in point, ESPN has Kevin Williams as a 4* but Rivals & Scout doesn't. On the flipside, Rivals & Scout has Tyler Moore as a 4* but ESPN doesn't.Very true, they all are weird and I think ESPN is the worst at it, in my opinion.All of those scouting services are wacky. It's not an exact science. I was just throwing out some hyperbole for perspective in Turene's case for the giggles.Turene was definatly worth the 4* ranking, but rivals is sometimes a little wacky with their rankings (see tyler moore).Believe it or not, Kent Turene was initially a 4* when he committed to USC over the summer. Then in September, Rivals updated their star rankings and dropped him to a 3*. Scout on the other hand had him as a 3* but boosted him to 4* in September.So you're saying the 4th star should be tacked on shortly?....Just received an offer from USC.
Moral of the story: Rivals hates USC now but Scout still loves them.
Meh, whatever....
Last edited by a moderator: