WR Quincy Adeboyejo [Ole Miss Commit]

why not said:
C N Red said:
austinhusker said:
C N Red said:
austinhusker said:
All yall bashing Sumlin and accusing him of "SEC" style recruiting tactics don't have a clue what you are talking about. This year's class has a lot of people that count for last year (they took a small class last year). Not to mention, of the current commitments, 9 or so are early enrollees this semester. Furthermore, there are at least 2 current commitments (Griffin and Victor Davis) that have basically no shot of qualifying... Before you call Sumlin "trash" or "scum," try to do some research first. Just sayin'.
Click to expand...
Sumlin is trash and scum. I don't need to do any research. Thanks.
Click to expand...

Did he steal your wife or something?? You don't have a clue what you are talking about.
Click to expand...
No, just havin some fun. But don't come on here and try telling us any team in the SEC, or coached by Urban Meyer, is on the up and up with recruiting and over signing practices. It's pretty frickin obvious.
Click to expand...
I agree. The nerve of some people to come on to this board and challenge your stereotypes with actual facts.
Click to expand...
Someone ran the numbers the other day and he would be around 8 over the 85 limit. So Sumlin is going to have to cut. Plan and simple. Which is also unethical.

 
Hedley Lamarr said:
I am going to assume all of A&Ms players are on 1 year renewable scholarships.
Click to expand...
I believe all D1 athletes are on 1 year renewable scholarships. The $EC seams to be the one d bag conference that actually uses this to their advantage and cuts under performing players loose so they can sign bigger classes, apparently aTm has caught on quickly.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
HuskerT said:
Hedley Lamarr said:
I am going to assume all of A&Ms players are on 1 year renewable scholarships.
Click to expand...
I believe all D1 athletes are on 1 year renewable scholarships. The $EC seams to be the one d bag conference that actually uses this to their advantage and cuts under performing players loose, apparently aTm has caught on quickly.
Click to expand...
Sooo they are using the scholarships on a yearly basis. They are on an athletic scholarship. If they are not performing at the needed level they can be removed from said scholarship. You don't get to maintain your academic scholarship for "effort" you get it for maintaining the required GPA. You get to maintain your athletic scholarship by playing at the level needed.

I'm not saying I agree with it I am just trying to figure out exactly how they look at the situation.

 
HuskerT said:
Hedley Lamarr said:
I am going to assume all of A&Ms players are on 1 year renewable scholarships.
Click to expand...
I believe all D1 athletes are on 1 year renewable scholarships. The $EC seams to be the one d bag conference that actually uses this to their advantage and cuts under performing players loose so they can sign bigger classes, apparently aTm has caught on quickly.
Click to expand...
This year the big 10 including nebraska went to 4 year scholarships va the normal one year renewable that had been normal

Kind of interesting, wonder if it is a recruiting advantage?

 
Amac3309 said:
HuskerT said:
Hedley Lamarr said:
I am going to assume all of A&Ms players are on 1 year renewable scholarships.
Click to expand...
I believe all D1 athletes are on 1 year renewable scholarships. The $EC seams to be the one d bag conference that actually uses this to their advantage and cuts under performing players loose so they can sign bigger classes, apparently aTm has caught on quickly.
Click to expand...
This year the big 10 including nebraska went to 4 year scholarships va the normal one year renewable that had been normal

Kind of interesting, wonder if it is a recruiting advantage?
Click to expand...
Pros and Cons with this. It can in a sense hurt dropping dead weight on the roster. On the other hand if you need to free up some roster space you can still get guys off the roster. It also allows the SEC to continue what they are doing while the B1G stays in neutral. Pros could be used as a recruiting angle but the best players don't worry about being cut.

 
Amac3309 said:
HuskerT said:
Hedley Lamarr said:
I am going to assume all of A&Ms players are on 1 year renewable scholarships.
Click to expand...
I believe all D1 athletes are on 1 year renewable scholarships. The $EC seams to be the one d bag conference that actually uses this to their advantage and cuts under performing players loose so they can sign bigger classes, apparently aTm has caught on quickly.
Click to expand...
This year the big 10 including nebraska went to 4 year scholarships va the normal one year renewable that had been normal

Kind of interesting, wonder if it is a recruiting advantage?
Click to expand...
True, I believe the rule was changed starting this year allowing 4 year schollies. Definitely helps the student athletes, but I wont expect the $EC to adopt this assuming its optional.

 
Sumlin isn't over the number limit in the 25 or 85 number. Quincy is a good kid and we wish him the best, but he didn't like the fact we were signing 8 WRs and TEs. It's fair.

 
Atbone95 said:
AgMarauder04 said:
Sumlin isn't over the number limit in the 25 or 85 number. Quincy is a good kid and we wish him the best, but he didn't like the fact we were signing 8 WRs and TEs. It's fair.
Click to expand...
Keep telling yourself that.
Click to expand...
They do have 9 early enrollees and 25 non early enrollees currently. Last year signed a class of 18. Not counting any transfers or medical RS. It is very possible that they are not over signing.

 
HuskerT said:
Hedley Lamarr said:
I am going to assume all of A&Ms players are on 1 year renewable scholarships.
Click to expand...
I believe all D1 athletes are on 1 year renewable scholarships. The $EC seams to be the one d bag conference that actually uses this to their advantage and cuts under performing players loose so they can sign bigger classes, apparently aTm has caught on quickly.
Click to expand...
And I'm sure that none of the kids have ANY idea that this is the way that its going to work for high performing programs. Get real; all of the kids know whats going on and if they're that concerned about the possibility of getting dropped for under performance (which I'd be willing to bet is attitude related in a number of cases) then they should sign somewhere else.

 
Back
Top